% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Wuttig:905426,
author = {Wuttig, Matthias},
title = {{M}etavalent {B}onding in {S}olids: {P}rovocation or
{P}romise?},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-00667},
year = {2021},
abstract = {Scientists and practitioners have long dreamt of designing
materials with novel properties. Yet, a hundred years after
quantum mechanics lay the foundations for a systematic
description of the properties of solids, it is still not
possible to predict the best material in applications such
as photovoltaics, superconductivity or thermoelectric energy
conversion. This is a sign of the complexity of the problem,
which is often exacerbated by the need to optimize
conflicting material properties. Hence, one can ponder if
design routes for materials can be devised. In recent years,
the focus of our work has been on designing advanced
functional materials with attractive opto-electronic
properties, including phase change materials,
thermoelectrics, photonic switches and materials for
photovoltaics. These materials are typically discussed as
unconventional semiconductors, often but not always, with
appreciable charge transfer. Phase Change Materials have
provided a special challenge for materials optimization.
They possess a remarkable property portfolio, which includes
the ability to rapidly switch between the amorphous and
crystalline state. Surprisingly, in PCMs both states differ
significantly in their properties. This material combination
makes them very attractive for applications in rewriteable
optical and electronic data storage, as well as photonic
switches. In this talk, the unconventional material
properties will be attributed to a unique bonding mechanism
(metavalent bonding). Further evidence for this bonding
mechanism comes from a quantum-chemical map, which separates
the known strong bonding mechanisms of metallic, ionic and
covalent bonding. The map reveals that metavalent bonding is
a new, fundamental bonding mechanism, which differs
substantially from metallic, covalent and ionic bonding.
This insight is subsequently employed to design phase change
as well as thermoelectric materials. Yet, the discoveries
presented here also force us to revisit the concept of
chemical bonds and bring back a history of vivid scientific
disputes about ‘the nature of the chemical bond’.},
month = {Apr},
date = {2021-04-17},
organization = {2021 Virtual MRS Spring Meeting,
Seattle (USA), 17 Apr 2021 - 23 Apr
2021},
subtyp = {Invited},
cin = {PGI-10},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)PGI-10-20170113},
pnm = {5233 - Memristive Materials and Devices (POF4-523)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5233},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)6},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/905426},
}