% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Naz:905603,
author = {Naz, Bibi S. and Sharples, Wendy and Goergen, Klaus and
Kollet, Stefan},
title = {{S}ensitivity of hydrological fluxes and states to
groundwater representation in continental scale simulations
over {E}urope.},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-00835},
year = {2021},
abstract = {<p>This study explores the influence of groundwater
representation on soil moisture, evapotranspiration, total
water storage, water table depth and groundwater
recharge/discharge through the comparison of multi-model
simulations using the stand-alone Community Land Model
(CLM3.5) and the ParFlow hydrologic model. ParFlow simulates
three-dimensional variably saturated groundwater flow
solving Richards equation and overland flow with a
two-dimensional kinematic wave approximation, whereas CLM3.5
applies a simple approach to simulate groundwater recharge
and discharge processes via the connection of bottom soil
layer and an unconfined aquifer. Over Europe with a lateral
resolution of 3km, both models were driven with the
COSMO-REA6 reanalysis dataset for the time period from 1997
to 2006 at an hourly time step using the same datasets for
the static input variables (such as topography, vegetation
and soil properties). Evaluation against independent
observations including satellite-derived and in-situ soil
moisture, evapotranspiration, and total water storage
datasets show that both models capture the interannual and
seasonal variations well at the regional scale, however
ParFlow performs better in simulating surface soil moisture
in comparison with in-situ data. Moreover, juxtaposition of
both models shows that simulations of water fluxes and sates
in both space and time are sensitive to the differences in
groundwater representation in the model. For example,
simulations with ParFlow have overall wetter soil moisture
than CLM, particularly in humid and cold regions and driest
soil moisture in the arid and semi-arid regions. Seasonally,
ParFlow simulates wetter soil moisture in winter and driest
in summer than CLM model. This study helps to understand and
quantify uncertainties in groundwater related processes in
hydrologic simulations and resulting implications for water
resources assessment at regional to continental scales.</p>},
month = {Apr},
date = {2022-04-19},
organization = {EGU General Assembly 2021, Online
(Austria), 19 Apr 2022 - 30 Apr 2022},
subtyp = {After Call},
cin = {IBG-3},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact
(POF4-217) / EoCoE-II - Energy Oriented Center of Excellence
: toward exascale for energy (824158)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173 / G:(EU-Grant)824158},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)6},
doi = {10.5194/egusphere-egu21-4341},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/905603},
}