guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Root Growth and Architecture of Wheat and Brachypodium Vary in Response to Algal Fertilizer in Soil and Solution > print |
| Home > Publications database > Root Growth and Architecture of Wheat and Brachypodium Vary in Response to Algal Fertilizer in Soil and Solution > print |
| 001 | 905806 | ||
| 005 | 20230123110554.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.3390/agronomy12020285 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2128/30586 |2 Handle |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:121490787 |2 altmetric |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000762800800001 |2 WOS |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2022-01026 |
| 041 | _ | _ | |a English |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 640 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Mau, Lisa |0 P:(DE-Juel1)176475 |b 0 |e First author |u fzj |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Root Growth and Architecture of Wheat and Brachypodium Vary in Response to Algal Fertilizer in Soil and Solution |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Basel |c 2022 |b MDPI |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1643212311_11321 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 500 | _ | _ | |a DFG |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a Alternative, recycled sources for mined phosphorus (P) fertilizers are needed to sustain future crop growth. Quantification of phenotypic adaptations and performance of plants with a recycled nutrient source is required to identify breeding targets and agronomy practices for new fertilization strategies. In this study, we tested the phenotypic responses of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and its genetic model, Brachypodium (Brachypodium distachyon), to dried algal biomass (with algae or high or low mineral P) under three growing conditions (fabricated ecosystems (EcoFABs), hydroponics, and sand). For both species, algal-grown plants had similar shoot biomass to mineral-grown plants, taking up more P than the low mineral P plants. Root phenotypes however were strongly influenced by nutrient form, especially in soilless conditions. Algae promoted the development of shorter and thicker roots, notably first and second order lateral roots. Root hairs were 21% shorter in Brachypodium, but 24% longer in wheat with algae compared to mineral high P. Our results are encouraging to new recycled fertilization strategies, showing algae is a nutrient source to wheat and Brachypodium. Variation in root phenotypes showed algal biomass is sensed by roots and is taken up at a higher amount per root length than mineral P. These phenotypes can be selected and further adapted in phenotype-based breeding for future renewal agriculture systems. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 2171 - Biological and environmental resources for sustainable use (POF4-217) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171 |c POF4-217 |f POF IV |x 0 |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a DFG Grant for all Projects for 2022 (DFG-ALL-2022) |0 G:(DE-Juel-1)DFG-ALL-2022 |c DFG-ALL-2022 |x 1 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Junker, Simone |0 P:(DE-Juel1)179547 |b 1 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Bochmann, Helena |0 P:(DE-Juel1)179094 |b 2 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Mihiret, Yeshambel E. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Kelm, Jana M. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)164816 |b 4 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Schrey, Silvia D. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)166424 |b 5 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Roessner, Ute |0 0000-0002-6482-2615 |b 6 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Schaaf, Gabriel |0 0000-0001-9022-4515 |b 7 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Watt, Michelle |0 P:(DE-Juel1)166460 |b 8 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Kant, Josefine |0 P:(DE-Juel1)169451 |b 9 |e Corresponding author |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Arsova, Borjana |0 P:(DE-Juel1)165155 |b 10 |e Last author |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.3390/agronomy12020285 |g Vol. 12, no. 2, p. 285 - |0 PERI:(DE-600)2607043-1 |n 2 |p 285 - |t Agronomy |v 12 |y 2022 |x 2073-4395 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/905806/files/agronomy-12-00285.pdf |y OpenAccess |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:905806 |p openaire |p open_access |p VDB |p driver |p dnbdelivery |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 0 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)176475 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 1 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)179547 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 2 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)179094 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a University of Bonn |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |b 3 |6 P:(DE-HGF)0 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 4 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)164816 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 5 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)166424 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a University of Melbourne |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |b 6 |6 0000-0002-6482-2615 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a University of Bonn |0 I:(DE-HGF)0 |b 7 |6 0000-0001-9022-4515 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 9 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)169451 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 10 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)165155 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt |l Erde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten |9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171 |x 0 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2022 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160 |2 StatID |b Essential Science Indicators |d 2021-05-04 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4 |2 HGFVOC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |d 2021-05-04 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Fees |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700 |2 StatID |d 2021-05-04 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Article Processing Charges |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561 |2 StatID |d 2021-05-04 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b AGRONOMY-BASEL : 2021 |d 2022-11-11 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2022-11-11 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2022-11-11 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501 |2 StatID |b DOAJ Seal |d 2022-01-24T07:41:22Z |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500 |2 StatID |b DOAJ |d 2022-01-24T07:41:22Z |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b DOAJ : Blind peer review |d 2022-01-24T07:41:22Z |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 |2 StatID |b Ebsco Academic Search |d 2022-11-11 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b ASC |d 2022-11-11 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2022-11-11 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2022-11-11 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences |d 2022-11-11 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a IF < 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900 |2 StatID |d 2022-11-11 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118 |k IBG-2 |l Pflanzenwissenschaften |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118 |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|