% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{McKenna:905941,
author = {McKenna, Russell and Pfenninger, Stefan and Heinrichs,
Heidi and Schmidt, Johannes and Staffell, Iain and Bauer,
Christian and Gruber, Katharina and Hahmann, Andrea N. and
Jansen, Malte and Klingler, Michael and Landwehr, Natascha
and Larsén, Xiaoli Guo and Lilliestam, Johan and Pickering,
Bryn and Robinius, Martin and Tröndle, Tim and Turkovska,
Olga and Wehrle, Sebastian and Weinand, Jann Michael and
Wohland, Jan},
title = {{H}igh-resolution large-scale onshore wind energy
assessments: {A} review of potential definitions,
methodologies and future research needs},
journal = {Renewable energy},
volume = {182},
issn = {0960-1481},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-01123},
pages = {659 - 684},
year = {2022},
abstract = {The rapid uptake of renewable energy technologies in recent
decades has increased the demand of energy researchers,
policymakers and energy planners for reliable data on the
spatial distribution of their costs and potentials. For
onshore wind energy this has resulted in an active research
field devoted to analysing these resources for regions,
countries or globally. A particular thread of this research
attempts to go beyond purely technical or spatial
restrictions and determine the realistic, feasible or actual
potential for wind energy. Motivated by these developments,
this paper reviews methods and assumptions for analysing
geographical, technical, economic and, finally, feasible
onshore wind potentials. We address each of these potentials
in turn, including aspects related to land eligibility
criteria, energy meteorology, and technical developments of
wind turbine characteristics such as power density, specific
rotor power and spacing aspects. Economic aspects of
potential assessments are central to future deployment and
are discussed on a turbine and system level covering
levelized costs depending on locations, and the system
integration costs which are often overlooked in such
analyses. Non-technical approaches include scenicness
assessments of the landscape, constraints due to regulation
or public opposition, expert and stakeholder workshops,
willingness to pay/accept elicitations and socioeconomic
cost-benefit studies. For each of these different potential
estimations, the state of the art is critically discussed,
with an attempt to derive best practice recommendations and
highlight avenues for future research.},
cin = {IEK-3},
ddc = {620},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013},
pnm = {1111 - Effective System Transformation Pathways (POF4-111)
/ 1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways
(POF4-111)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1111 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000714438500002},
doi = {10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.027},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/905941},
}