% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Vgele:906079,
      author       = {Vögele, S. and Govorukha, K. and Mayer, P. and Rhoden, I.
                      and Rübbelke, D. and Kuckshinrichs, W.},
      title        = {{E}ffects of a coal phase-out in {E}urope on reaching the
                      {UN} sustainable development goals},
      journal      = {Environment, development and sustainability},
      volume       = {25},
      issn         = {1387-585X},
      address      = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2022-01212},
      pages        = {879-916},
      year         = {2023},
      abstract     = {Several European countries plan to phase out coal-fired
                      power plants in order to reach their greenhouse gas
                      abatement targets. Additionally, the phase-out will bring
                      about so-called ancillary effects or co-effects. In our
                      study, we focus on the co-effects induced in the countries
                      that export coal to Europe. Furthermore, we examine the
                      ancillary effects imposed on China as a major supplier of
                      technologies (like solar energy technologies) that will
                      replace coal-fired power plants. Using a combination of an
                      input-output model, econometric analysis and employing the
                      concept of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development
                      Goals, we assess impacts of coal phase-out policies on
                      environmental, economic, and societal dimensions. Our
                      results show that despite negative impacts on income and
                      employment in coalexporting countries, a phase-out of
                      coal-fired power plants is linked with multiple positive
                      effects. In particular, we observe improvements in water
                      management and biodiversity conservation, reduced release of
                      pollutants, and improvements on a societal level. However,
                      even if we consider a reduction in the use of coal in the
                      European steel production sector as an additional challenge,
                      these positive impacts on coal exporting countries remain
                      rathersmall. The same applies to the effects we observe for
                      China.},
      cin          = {IEK-STE},
      ddc          = {333.7},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
      pnm          = {1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways
                      (POF4-111)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000749403100001},
      doi          = {10.1007/s10668-021-02083-8},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/906079},
}