% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Breuer:906321,
      author       = {Breuer, Janos Lucian and Scholten, Juri and Koj, Jan
                      Christian and Schorn, Felix and Fiebrandt, Marc and Samsun,
                      Remzi Can and Albus, Rolf and Görner, Klaus and Stolten,
                      Detlef and Peters, Ralf},
      title        = {{A}n {O}verview of {P}romising {A}lternative {F}uels for
                      {R}oad, {R}ail, {A}ir, and {I}nland {W}aterway {T}ransport
                      in {G}ermany},
      journal      = {Energies},
      volume       = {15},
      number       = {4},
      issn         = {1996-1073},
      address      = {Basel},
      publisher    = {MDPI},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2022-01371},
      pages        = {1443 -},
      year         = {2022},
      abstract     = {To solve the challenge of decarbonizing the transport
                      sector, a broad variety of alternative fuels based on
                      different concepts, including Power-to-Gas and
                      Power-to-Liquid, and propulsion systems, have been
                      developed. The current research landscape is investigating
                      either a selection of fuel options or a selection of
                      criteria, a comprehensive overview is missing so far. This
                      study aims to close this gap by providing a holistic
                      analysis of existing fuel and drivetrain options, spanning
                      production to utilization. For this purpose, a case study
                      for Germany is performed considering different vehicle
                      classes in road, rail, inland waterway, and air transport.
                      The evaluated criteria on the production side include
                      technical maturity, costs, as well as environmental impacts,
                      whereas, on the utilization side, possible blending with
                      existing fossil fuels and the satisfaction of the required
                      mission ranges are evaluated. Overall, the fuels and
                      propulsion systems, Methanol-to-Gasoline, Fischer–Tropsch
                      diesel and kerosene, hydrogen, battery-electric propulsion,
                      HVO, DME, and natural gas are identified as promising future
                      options. All of these promising fuels could reach near-zero
                      greenhouse gas emissions bounded to some mandatory
                      preconditions. However, the current research landscape is
                      characterized by high insecurity with regard to fuel costs,
                      depending on the predicted range and length of value
                      chains.},
      cin          = {IEK-14 / IEK-3 / IEK-STE},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-14-20191129 / I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013 /
                      I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
      pnm          = {1232 - Power-based Fuels and Chemicals (POF4-123) / 1111 -
                      Effective System Transformation Pathways (POF4-111) / 1112 -
                      Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways (POF4-111) / DFG
                      project 491111487 - Open-Access-Publikationskosten / 2022 -
                      2024 / Forschungszentrum Jülich (OAPKFZJ) (491111487)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1232 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1111 /
                      G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112 / G:(GEPRIS)491111487},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000763046200001},
      doi          = {10.3390/en15041443},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/906321},
}