% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Damm:906463,
author = {Damm, A. and Cogliati, S. and Colombo, R. and Fritsche, L.
and Genangeli, A. and Genesio, L. and Hanus, J. and
Peressotti, A. and Rademske, P. and Rascher, U. and
Schuettemeyer, D. and Siegmann, B. and Sturm, J. and
Miglietta, F.},
title = {{R}esponse times of remote sensing measured sun-induced
chlorophyll fluorescence, surface temperature and vegetation
indices to evolving soil water limitation in a crop canopy},
journal = {Remote sensing of environment},
volume = {273},
issn = {0034-4257},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-01466},
pages = {112957 -},
year = {2022},
abstract = {Vegetation responds at varying temporal scales to changing
soil water availability. These process dynamics complicate
assessments of plant-water relations but also offer various
access points to advance understanding of vegetation
responses to environmental change. Remote sensing (RS)
provides large capacity to quantify sensitive and robust
information of vegetation responses and underlying abiotic
change driver across observational scales. Retrieved RS
based vegetation parameters are often sensitive to various
environmental and plant specific factors in addition to the
targeted plant response. Further, individual plant responses
to water limitation act at different temporal and spatial
scales, while RS sampling schemes are often not optimized to
assess these dynamics. The combination of these aspects
complicates the interpretation of RS parameter when
assessing plant-water relations. We consequently aim to
advance insight on the sensitivity of physiological,
biochemical and structural RS parameter for plant adaptation
in response to emerging soil water limitation. We made a
field experiment in maize in Tuscany (Central Italy), while
irrigation was stopped in some areas of the drip-irrigated
field. Within a period of two weeks, we measured the
hydraulic and physiological state of maize plants in situ
and complemented these detailed measurements with extensive
airborne observations (e.g. sun-induced chlorophyll
fluorescence (SIF), vegetation indices sensitive for
photosynthesis, pigment and water content, land surface
temperature). We observe a double response of far-red SIF
with a short-term increase after manifestation of soil water
limitation and a decrease afterwards. We identify different
response times of RS parameter representing different plant
adaptation mechanisms ranging from short term responses
(e.g. stomatal conductance, photosynthesis) to medium term
changes (e.g. pigment decomposition, changing leaf water
content). Our study demonstrates complementarity of common
and new RS parameter to mechanistically assess the complex
cascade of functional, biochemical and structural plant
responses to evolving soil water limitation.},
cin = {IBG-2},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact
(POF4-217)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000774322700002},
doi = {10.1016/j.rse.2022.112957},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/906463},
}