% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Chakhvashvili:906543,
author = {Chakhvashvili, Erekle and Siegmann, Bastian and Muller,
Onno and Verrelst, Jochem and Bendig, Juliane and Kraska,
Thorsten and Rascher, Uwe},
title = {{R}etrieval of {C}rop {V}ariables from {P}roximal
{M}ultispectral {UAV} {I}mage {D}ata {U}sing {PROSAIL} in
{M}aize {C}anopy},
journal = {Remote sensing},
volume = {14},
number = {5},
issn = {2072-4292},
address = {Basel},
publisher = {MDPI},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-01507},
pages = {1247 -},
year = {2022},
abstract = {Mapping crop variables at different growth stages is
crucial to inform farmers and plant breeders about the crop
status. For mapping purposes, inversion of canopy radiative
transfer models (RTMs) is a viable alternative to parametric
and non-parametric regression models, which often lack
transferability in time and space. Due to the physical
nature of RTMs, inversion outputs can be delivered in sound
physical units that reflect the underlying processes in the
canopy. In this study, we explored the capabilities of the
coupled leaf–canopy RTM PROSAIL applied to high-spatial
resolution (0.015 m) multispectral unmanned aerial vehicle
(UAV) data to retrieve the leaf chlorophyll content (LCC),
leaf area index (LAI) and canopy chlorophyll content (CCC)
of sweet and silage maize throughout one growing season. Two
different retrieval methods were tested: (i) applying the
RTM inversion scheme to mean reflectance data derived from
single breeding plots (mean reflectance approach) and (ii)
applying the same inversion scheme to an orthomosaic to
separately retrieve the target variables for each pixel of
the breeding plots (pixel-based approach). For LCC
retrieval, soil and shaded pixels were removed by applying
simple vegetation index thresholding. Retrieval of LCC from
UAV data yielded promising results compared to ground
measurements (sweet maize RMSE = 4.92 μg/cm2, silage maize
RMSE = 3.74 μg/cm2) when using the mean reflectance
approach. LAI retrieval was more challenging due to the
blending of sunlit and shaded pixels present in the UAV
data, but worked well at the early developmental stages
(sweet maize RMSE = 0.70m2/m2, silage RMSE = 0.61m2/m2
across all dates). CCC retrieval significantly benefited
from the pixel-based approach compared to the mean
reflectance approach (RMSEs decreased from 45.6 to 33.1
μg/m2). We argue that high-resolution UAV imagery is well
suited for LCC retrieval, as shadows and background soil can
be precisely removed, leaving only green plant pixels for
the analysis. As for retrieving LAI,it proved to be
challenging for two distinct varieties of maize that were
characterized by contrasting canopy geometry.},
cin = {IBG-2},
ddc = {620},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {2171 - Biological and environmental resources for
sustainable use (POF4-217)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2171},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000773836200001},
doi = {10.3390/rs14051247},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/906543},
}