% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Greenwood:906598,
      author       = {Greenwood, Matthew and Wrogemann, Jens Matthies and
                      Schmuch, Richard and Jang, Hwamyung and Winter, Martin and
                      Leker, Jens},
      title        = {{T}he {B}attery {C}omponent {R}eadiness {L}evel ({BC}-{RL})
                      framework: {A} technology-specific development framework},
      journal      = {Journal of power sources advances},
      volume       = {14},
      issn         = {2666-2485},
      address      = {[Amsterdam]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier ScienceDirect},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2022-01546},
      pages        = {100089 -},
      year         = {2022},
      abstract     = {Government investment constitutes a large portion of
                      overall investment in research and development of
                      lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and other future battery
                      technologies with the goal of electrifying the
                      transportation sector and so removing a major source of
                      global greenhouse gas emissions. Poor investments, however,
                      can result in taxpayer funding losses and political
                      backlash, making clear communication and informed
                      decision-making critical. This manuscript presents the
                      Battery Component Readiness Level scale, an overhauled
                      version of the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) scale
                      currently utilized by the EU for innovation programs that
                      has been customized for use in battery technology
                      development. It retains the structure of the EU TRL scale
                      while adding in-depth description of technology-specific
                      development as well as discussion of aspects such as
                      manufacturability and cost that are necessary to understand
                      technological promise and risk. Its use by the EU and other
                      parties involved in battery development can thus improve
                      communication between all involved sectors, from government
                      to academia to industry, and can aid in better-informed
                      decision-making regarding investments. This can ultimately
                      contribute to a more efficient electrification of the
                      transportation sector and any other sectors where batteries
                      display transformative potential.},
      cin          = {IEK-12},
      ddc          = {621.3},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-12-20141217},
      pnm          = {1221 - Fundamentals and Materials (POF4-122)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1221},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000783052400004},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.powera.2022.100089},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/906598},
}