guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Associations between Taste and Smell Sensitivity, Preference and Quality of Life in Healthy Aging—The NutriAct Family Study Examinations (NFSE) Cohort > print |
| Home > Publications database > Associations between Taste and Smell Sensitivity, Preference and Quality of Life in Healthy Aging—The NutriAct Family Study Examinations (NFSE) Cohort > print |
| 001 | 906826 | ||
| 005 | 20230301150007.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.3390/nu14061141 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2128/31818 |2 Handle |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 35334798 |2 pmid |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000776358900001 |2 WOS |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2022-01720 |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 610 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Lim, Shirley X. L. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)176783 |b 0 |e Corresponding author |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Associations between Taste and Smell Sensitivity, Preference and Quality of Life in Healthy Aging—The NutriAct Family Study Examinations (NFSE) Cohort |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Basel |c 2022 |b MDPI |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1662632979_19930 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a Taste and smell function decline with age, with robust impairment in the very old. Much less is known about taste and smell function in young and middle aged. We investigated taste and smell sensitivity via thresholds in a sub-sample of the NutriAct Family Study (NFS), the NFS Examinations cohort (NFSE; N = 251, age M = 62.5 years). We examined different aspects relating to taste and smell function: the degree to which taste and smell sensitivity relate to another and to taste and smell preferences, the role of gender and age, as well as effects on Quality of Life (QoL). Taste thresholds were highly correlated, but no correlation was observed between taste and smell thresholds and between thresholds and preference. Women were more sensitive for both taste and smell than men. We found no effect of age on sensitivity and no effect of sensitivity on QoL. All null findings were complemented by Bayesian statistics. Together our results indicate the independence of taste and smell despite their overlap during sensorial experiences. We found no evidence for age-related sensory decline, which could be due to our sample’s characteristics of non-clinical volunteers with good dental health and 93% non-smokers. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability (POF4-525) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251 |c POF4-525 |f POF IV |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Höchenberger, Richard |0 P:(DE-Juel1)165363 |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Busch, Niko A. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Bergmann, Manuela |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Ohla, Kathrin |0 P:(DE-Juel1)165362 |b 4 |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.3390/nu14061141 |g Vol. 14, no. 6, p. 1141 - |0 PERI:(DE-600)2518386-2 |n 6 |p 1141 - |t Nutrients |v 14 |y 2022 |x 2072-6643 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/906826/files/nutrients-14-01141.pdf |y OpenAccess |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:906826 |p openaire |p open_access |p OpenAPC |p driver |p VDB |p openCost |p dnbdelivery |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 0 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)176783 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Key Technologies |l Natural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Decoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction |9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251 |x 0 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2022 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160 |2 StatID |b Essential Science Indicators |d 2021-05-04 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190 |2 StatID |b Biological Abstracts |d 2021-05-04 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4 |2 HGFVOC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |d 2021-05-04 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Fees |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700 |2 StatID |d 2021-05-04 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Article Processing Charges |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561 |2 StatID |d 2021-05-04 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2022-11-09 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2022-11-09 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501 |2 StatID |b DOAJ Seal |d 2022-08-27T10:32:17Z |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500 |2 StatID |b DOAJ |d 2022-08-27T10:32:17Z |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b DOAJ : Blind peer review |d 2022-08-27T10:32:17Z |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2022-11-09 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2022-11-09 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050 |2 StatID |b BIOSIS Previews |d 2022-11-09 |
| 915 | p | c | |a APC keys set |2 APC |0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000 |
| 915 | p | c | |a Local Funding |2 APC |0 PC:(DE-HGF)0001 |
| 915 | p | c | |a DFG OA Publikationskosten |2 APC |0 PC:(DE-HGF)0002 |
| 915 | p | c | |a DOAJ Journal |2 APC |0 PC:(DE-HGF)0003 |
| 920 | _ | _ | |l yes |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406 |k INM-3 |l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften |x 0 |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a APC |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|