% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Buman:906993,
author = {Buman, Bastian and Hueni, Andreas and Colombo, Roberto and
Cogliati, Sergio and Celesti, Marco and Julitta, Tommaso and
Burkart, Andreas and Siegmann, Bastian and Rascher, Uwe and
Drusch, Matthias and Damm, Alexander},
title = {{T}owards consistent assessments of in situ radiometric
measurements for the validation of fluorescence satellite
missions},
journal = {Remote sensing of environment},
volume = {274},
issn = {0034-4257},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-01805},
pages = {112984 -},
year = {2022},
abstract = {The upcoming Fluorescence Explorer (FLEX) satellite mission
aims to provide high quality radiometric measurementsfor
subsequent retrieval of sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence
(SIF). The combination of SIF withother observations
stemming from the FLEX/Sentinel-3 tandem mission holds the
potential to assess complexecosystem processes. The
calibration and validation (cal/val) of these radiometric
measurements and derivedproducts are central but challenging
components of the mission. This contribution outlines
strategies for theassessment of in situ radiometric
measurements and retrieved SIF. We demonstrate how in situ
spectrometermeasurements can be analysed in terms of
radiometric, spectral and spatial uncertainties. The
analysis of morethan 200 k spectra yields an average bias
between two radiometric measurements by two individual
spectrometersof $8\%,$ with a larger variability in
measurements of downwelling radiance $(25\%)$ compared to
upwellingradiance $(6\%).$ Spectral shifts in the
spectrometer relevant for SIF retrievals are consistently
below 1spectral pixel (up to 0.75). Found spectral shifts
appear to be mostly dependent on temperature (as measured
bya temperature probe in the instrument). Retrieved SIF
shows a low variability of $1.8\%$ compared with a
noisereduced SIF estimate based on APAR. A combination of
airborne imaging and in situ non-imaging
fluorescencespectroscopy highlights the importance of a
homogenous sampling surface and holds the potential to
furtheruncover SIF retrieval issues as here shown for early
evening acquisitions. Our experiments clearly indicate
theneed for careful site selection, measurement protocols,
as well as the need for harmonized processing. This workthus
contributes to guiding cal/val activities for the upcoming
FLEX mission.},
cin = {IBG-2},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact
(POF4-217)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000798668300001},
doi = {10.1016/j.rse.2022.112984},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/906993},
}