% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Haase:907706,
      author       = {Haase, Mona and Wulf, C. and Baumann, M. and Rösch, C. and
                      Weil, M. and Zapp, P. and Naegler, T.},
      title        = {{P}rospective assessment of energy technologies: {A}
                      comprehensive approach for sustainability assessment},
      journal      = {Energy, Sustainability and Society},
      volume       = {12},
      number       = {1},
      issn         = {2192-0567},
      address      = {Heidelberg},
      publisher    = {Springer},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2022-02169},
      pages        = {20},
      year         = {2022},
      abstract     = {Background: A further increase in renewable energy supply
                      is needed to substitute fossil fuels and combat climate
                      change. Each energy source and respective technologies have
                      specific techno-economic and environmental characteristics
                      as well as social implications. This paper presents a
                      comprehensive approach for prospective sustainability
                      assessment of energy technologies developed within the
                      Helmholtz Initiative “Energy System 2050”
                      (ES2050).Methods: The “ES2050 approach” comprises
                      environmental, economic, and social assessment. It includes
                      established life cycle based economic and environmental
                      indicators, and social indicators derived from a normative
                      concept of sustainable development. The elaborated social
                      indicators, i.e. patent growth rate, acceptance, and
                      domestic value added, address three different
                      socio-technical areas, i.e. innovation (patents), public
                      perception (acceptance), and public welfare (value
                      added).Results: The implementation of the “ES2050
                      approach” is presented exemplarily and different
                      sustainability indicators and respective results are
                      discussed based on three emerging technologies and
                      corresponding case studies: (1) synthetic biofuels for
                      mobility; (2) hydrogen from wind power for mobility; and (3)
                      batteries for stationary energy storage. For synthetic
                      biofuel, the environmental advantages over fossil gasoline
                      are most apparent for the impact categories Climate Change
                      and Ionizing Radiation—human health. Domestic value added
                      accounts for $66\%$ for synthetic biofuel compared to $13\%$
                      for fossil gasoline. All hydrogen supply options can be
                      considered to become near to economic competitiveness with
                      fossil fuels in the long term. Survey participants regard
                      Explosion Hazard as the most pressing concern about hydrogen
                      fuel stations. For Li-ion batteries, the results for patent
                      growth rate indicate that they enter their maturity
                      phase.Conclusions: The “ES2050 approach” enables a
                      consistent prospective sustainability assessment of
                      (emerging) energy technologies, supporting technology
                      developers, decision-makers in politics, industry, and
                      society with knowledge for further evaluation, steering, and
                      governance. The approach presented is considered rather a
                      starting point than a blueprint for the comprehensive
                      assessment of renewable energy technologies though,
                      especially for the suggested social indicators, their
                      significance and their embedding in context scenarios for
                      prospective assessments.},
      cin          = {IEK-STE},
      ddc          = {333.7},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
      pnm          = {1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways
                      (POF4-111)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000799374300001},
      doi          = {10.1186/s13705-022-00344-6},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/907706},
}