% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Kops:908202,
author = {Kops, E. Rota and Hautzel, H. and Herzog, H. and Lerche, C.
and Shah, N. J.},
title = {{A}ttenuation {C}orrection of {C}erebellum in {PET}/{MR}
{D}ata},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-02453},
year = {2017},
abstract = {Abstract:Most approaches of modelling neuroreceptor PET
studies apply the cerebellum as reference area. Therefore,
it is mandatory that the respective attenuation correction
(AC) method for reconstructing the emission data is most
appropriate regarding cerebellar areas. PET data from PET/MR
scanners require alternative AC methods. These ought to be
tested with respect to the performance within the
cerebellum. This study aimed to compare various AC methods
for PET/MR data focussing on the cerebellum. Data of 16
subjects undergoing 18 FDG imaging in the Siemens
3TMR-BrainPET scanner and a whole head CT scan at the same
day were used. The latter were transformed to CT-based
attenuation maps (AM CT ). The MR images were used to obtain
AMs using the Boston-MGH method (AM MGH ), the London-UCL
method (AM UCL ), the CT-template-based (AM CT-Juel ) and
Tx-template-based (AM Tx-Juel ) Juelich methods. BrainPET
emission data were reconstructed with the five AM s . Using
the SUIT tool the cerebellum was extracted from the MR
images and normalized to a cerebellum VOI atlas. The
cerebellum of the PET data was extracted by applying the
same parameters. Correlation plots with regression
equations, coefficients of determination R 2 , normalized
and absolute normalized errors (NErr) between AM CT and the
other four AM s were calculated. The values of cerebellar
NErr varied to a high extent between the four AC methods. In
one subject AM MGH showed the lowest NErr $(3.03±1.60\%),$
in three participants the AMUCL performed best (NErr from
$-0.13±2.33\%$ to $0.91±2.93\%),$ in three others the AM
Tx-Juel had the best results (NErr from $-1.24±3.01\%$ to
$0.86±2.07\%),$ while for the remaining seven subjects the
AM CT-Juel performed best (NErr from $-2.08±0.94\%$ to
$7.98±3.43\%).$ Our results demonstrate that the
quantitation of radiotracer uptake in the cerebellum is very
susceptible to the respective attenuation correction applied
to the PET data. This, in turn, has to be considered in
neuroreceptor modelling studies which rely on the cerebellum
as reference.},
month = {Oct},
date = {2017-10-21},
organization = {2017 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium
and Medical Imaging Conference
(NSS/MIC), Atlanta (GA), 21 Oct 2017 -
28 Oct 2017},
cin = {INM-4 / INM-11 / JARA-BRAIN},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-11-20170113 /
I:(DE-Juel1)VDB1046},
pnm = {5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)1},
doi = {10.1109/NSSMIC.2017.8532870},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/908202},
}