% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Xu:908203,
author = {Xu, Hancong and Scheins, Juergen and Caldeira, Liliana and
Lenz, Mirjam and Ma, Bo and Lerche, Christoph and Shah, N.
J.},
title = {{R}esolution {M}odelling in {P}rojection {S}pace using
{F}actorized {M}ulti-block {D}etector {R}esponse {F}unction},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-02454},
year = {2018},
abstract = {Abstract:Position emission tomography (PET) images usually
suffer from low spatial resolution and signal-to-noise (SNR)
ratio. The degradation of image resolution in PET is caused
by detection process, e.g. inter-crystal scattering, crystal
penetration. An Accurate Detector Response Functions (DRF)
allows to model these phenomena and increase the spatial
resolution as well as SNR in the iterative image
reconstruction. However, fully 3D DRF for pixelated crystal
arrays (block) which also considers inter-block penetration
and inter-crystal scattering between different blocks still
remains challenging. Here we demonstrate the development of
an accurate DRF for the Siemens Hybrid MR-BrainPET system
with a 9-block model using GATE simulations. Different
incident γ rays are described by four parameters (x, y, θ,
φ) in Block Coordinate System. Their detection response,
comprising a list of fired crystals' id and corresponding
detection probability, are stored as an entry of a 4D
Look-up Table (LUT) addressed by (x, y, θ, φ). Based on
the DRF LUT, a PSF blurring kernel in 4D projection space
can be obtained by combining two multi-block DRF according
to the intersected block pair for each Line-of-Response. PSF
modelling in projection space is implemented in the
reconstruction toolkit PRESTO based on the developed DRF
LUT. A resolution phantom with 6 types of hot rods is
simulated by GATE and reconstructed by PRESTO with MLEM and
MLEM-PSF. Visual results demonstrate that with moderate
statistics (2.8×10 8 ), MLEM-PSF could recover small bins
(5 mm) at the edge of FOV in a more accurate way compared to
MLEM. Furthermore, the images of MLEM-PSF show better noise
suppression.},
month = {Nov},
date = {2018-11-10},
organization = {2018 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium
and Medical Imaging Conference
(NSS/MIC), Sydney (Australia), 10 Nov
2018 - 17 Nov 2018},
cin = {INM-11 / INM-4 / JARA-BRAIN},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-11-20170113 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406 /
I:(DE-Juel1)VDB1046},
pnm = {5253 - Neuroimaging (POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5253},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)1},
doi = {10.1109/NSSMIC.2018.8824424},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/908203},
}