% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Gutzen:908472,
author = {Gutzen, R.},
title = {{B}locks instead of puzzles pieces - analyzing cortical
wave activity across scales in an adaptable framework},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-02625},
year = {2022},
abstract = {The expanding availability and variety of data and
methodologies represent a great opportunity to access neural
processes in finer detail. Leveraging the complementary
insights from across experiments, species, and measurement
techniques, however, poses a challenge as the data is too
heterogeneous and the corresponding analyses too specific to
allow for rigorous quantitative comparisons of the results.
However, this challenge also promises new avenues of
scientific progress. By aligning existing data and analyses
from different sources in a reusable workflow we can build a
broader basis for meta-studies, contextualization of
individual studies, and model validation. Here, we showcase
such an analysis pipeline with the application to cortical
wave activity in the delta (‘slow waves’) and beta
range, integrating capabilities to process diverse data and
topical analytical methods within a consistent framework:
the ‘collaborative brain wave analysis pipeline’
(Cobrawap).The pipeline design is based on modular building
blocks that provide implementations of analysis methods and
processing steps. The components are matched by their
input-output relations and can be flexibly combined and
arranged into a workflow to fit the requirements of the data
and the scientific question. In this framework, by reusing
the identical methods and implementations and by converging
the heterogeneous data to a common descriptive level of wave
activity, we are in a situation where analysis outcomes can
be quantitatively compared using common characteristic
measures.We demonstrate the versatility of the pipeline by
analyzing slow wave activity in ECoG and calcium imaging
recordings to evaluate the influence of dataset-specific
parameters on the wave characteristics such as the type and
dose of anesthesia or the measurement modality and their
temporal and spatial resolution, and show that we can
replicate corresponding findings from the literature.
Furthermore, we show how the pipeline enables the
benchmarking of methods by analyzing the same data with
different method blocks and how the individual pipeline
elements can be reused, rearranged, or extended to help
derive analysis workflows for similar research endeavors and
amplify collaborative research.},
month = {Jun},
date = {2022-06-13},
organization = {Brain Activity across Scales and
Species: Analysis of Experiments and
Simulations, Rome (Italy), 13 Jun 2022
- 15 Jun 2022},
subtyp = {Invited},
cin = {INM-6 / INM-10 / IAS-6},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-6-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113 /
I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828},
pnm = {5235 - Digitization of Neuroscience and User-Community
Building (POF4-523) / HBP SGA2 - Human Brain Project
Specific Grant Agreement 2 (785907) / HBP SGA3 - Human Brain
Project Specific Grant Agreement 3 (945539) / HAF -
Helmholtz Analytics Framework (ZT-I-0003)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5235 / G:(EU-Grant)785907 /
G:(EU-Grant)945539 / G:(DE-HGF)ZT-I-0003},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)31},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/908472},
}