% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Weinand:908699,
      author       = {Weinand, Jann Michael and Naber, Elias and McKenna, Russell
                      and Lehmann, Paul and Kotzur, Leander and Stolten, Detlef},
      title        = {{H}istoric drivers of onshore wind power siting and
                      inevitable future trade-offs},
      journal      = {Environmental research letters},
      volume       = {17},
      number       = {7},
      issn         = {1748-9318},
      address      = {Bristol},
      publisher    = {IOP Publ.},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2022-02773},
      pages        = {074018 -},
      year         = {2022},
      abstract     = {The required acceleration of onshore wind deployment
                      requires the consideration of both economic and social
                      criteria. With a spatially explicit analysis of the
                      validated European turbine stock, we show that historical
                      siting focused on cost-effectiveness of turbines and
                      minimization of local disamenities, resulting in substantial
                      regional inequalities. A multi-criteria turbine allocation
                      approach demonstrates in 180 different scenarios that strong
                      trade-offs have to be made in the future expansion by 2050.
                      The sites of additional onshore wind turbines can be
                      associated with up to $43\%$ lower costs on average, up to
                      $42\%$ higher regional equality, or up to $93\%$ less
                      affected population than at existing turbine locations.
                      Depending on the capacity generation target, repowering
                      decisions and spatial scale for siting, the mean costs
                      increase by at least $18\%$ if the affected population is
                      minimized — even more so if regional equality is
                      maximized. Meaningful regulations that compensate the
                      affected regions for neglecting one of the criteria are
                      urgently needed.},
      cin          = {IEK-3},
      ddc          = {690},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013},
      pnm          = {1111 - Effective System Transformation Pathways (POF4-111)
                      / 1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways
                      (POF4-111)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1111 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000816870700001},
      doi          = {10.1088/1748-9326/ac7603},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/908699},
}