Home > Publications database > Historic drivers of onshore wind power siting and inevitable future trade-offs > print

001     908699
005     20240711101528.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1088/1748-9326/ac7603
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1748-9318
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1748-9326
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/31508
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:129374107
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a WOS:000816870700001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2022-02773
082 _ _ |a 690
100 1 _ |a Weinand, Jann Michael
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)190787
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Historic drivers of onshore wind power siting and inevitable future trade-offs
260 _ _ |a Bristol
|c 2022
|b IOP Publ.
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1658473013_7104
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The required acceleration of onshore wind deployment requires the consideration of both economic and social criteria. With a spatially explicit analysis of the validated European turbine stock, we show that historical siting focused on cost-effectiveness of turbines and minimization of local disamenities, resulting in substantial regional inequalities. A multi-criteria turbine allocation approach demonstrates in 180 different scenarios that strong trade-offs have to be made in the future expansion by 2050. The sites of additional onshore wind turbines can be associated with up to 43% lower costs on average, up to 42% higher regional equality, or up to 93% less affected population than at existing turbine locations. Depending on the capacity generation target, repowering decisions and spatial scale for siting, the mean costs increase by at least 18% if the affected population is minimized — even more so if regional equality is maximized. Meaningful regulations that compensate the affected regions for neglecting one of the criteria are urgently needed.
536 _ _ |a 1111 - Effective System Transformation Pathways (POF4-111)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1111
|c POF4-111
|f POF IV
|x 0
536 _ _ |a 1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways (POF4-111)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112
|c POF4-111
|f POF IV
|x 1
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Naber, Elias
|0 0000-0001-6945-2644
|b 1
700 1 _ |a McKenna, Russell
|0 0000-0001-6758-482X
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Lehmann, Paul
|0 0000-0001-7999-9125
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Kotzur, Leander
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)168451
|b 4
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Stolten, Detlef
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129928
|b 5
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1088/1748-9326/ac7603
|g Vol. 17, no. 7, p. 074018 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2255379-4
|n 7
|p 074018 -
|t Environmental research letters
|v 17
|y 2022
|x 1748-9318
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/908699/files/Weinand_2022_Environ._Res._Lett._17_074018-1.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:908699
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)190787
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)168451
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129928
910 1 _ |a RWTH Aachen
|0 I:(DE-588b)36225-6
|k RWTH
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129928
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Energiesystemdesign (ESD)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-110
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-111
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Energiesystemtransformation
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1111
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Energiesystemdesign (ESD)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-110
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-111
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Energiesystemtransformation
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112
|x 1
914 1 _ |y 2022
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2021-02-04
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-15
|w ger
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b ENVIRON RES LETT : 2021
|d 2022-11-15
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2022-11-15
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2022-11-15
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2020-03-03T09:34:42Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2020-03-03T09:34:42Z
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Peer review
|d 2020-03-03T09:34:42Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2022-11-15
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2022-11-15
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
|d 2022-11-15
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2022-11-15
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b ENVIRON RES LETT : 2021
|d 2022-11-15
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013
|k IEK-3
|l Technoökonomische Systemanalyse
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013
980 _ _ |a APC
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-2-20101013

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21