000908875 001__ 908875
000908875 005__ 20230307145816.0
000908875 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/land11060784
000908875 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/31594
000908875 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000816555200001
000908875 037__ $$aFZJ-2022-02889
000908875 082__ $$a630
000908875 1001_ $$00000-0001-5492-109X$$aAsaye, Zeleke$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000908875 245__ $$aEffects of Combined Application of Compost and Mineral Fertilizer on Soil Carbon and Nutrient Content, Yield, and Agronomic Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Maize-Potato Cropping Systems in Southern Ethiopia
000908875 260__ $$aBasel$$bMDPI$$c2022
000908875 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000908875 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000908875 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1659089870_31780
000908875 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000908875 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000908875 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000908875 520__ $$aLow nutrient input and low soil fertility are limiting agricultural productivity in Ethiopia. The main objectives were therefore to evaluate the effects of combined compost and mineral fertilizer (MF) application on soil properties, yield, agronomic nitrogen use efficiency, and adoption of compost application in maize (Zey mays L.)—potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) cropping systems. Yield data were collected from 20 smallholders applying (i) compost and MF at a total rate of 110 kg N ha−1, with 6 Mg compost ha−1 + MF (6CF), 12 Mg compost ha−1 + MF (12CF), and 16 Mg compost ha−1 + MF (16CF; compost on a fresh weight basis), (ii) MF application of 108 kg N ha−1 (F), and (iii) zero fertilization. Soil from 0–20 and 20–40 cm depths was collected from 16 farms using compost and MF. Compost + MF treatments showed significantly lower soil bulk density and iron contents, while pH, electrical conductivity, and cation exchange capacity were higher compared to F treatments. The 6CF, 12CF, and 16CF showed 22, 43, and 54% higher maize grain yield and 8, 16, and 18% higher potato tuber yield compared to F, respectively. The scarcity of organic material was a major socioeconomic constraint for smallholders for producing and applying compost
000908875 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173$$a2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact (POF4-217)$$cPOF4-217$$fPOF IV$$x0
000908875 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
000908875 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKim, Dong-Gill$$b1
000908875 7001_ $$00000-0001-6149-5754$$aYimer, Fantaw$$b2
000908875 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)171851$$aProst, Katharina$$b3
000908875 7001_ $$00000-0001-9186-563X$$aObsa, Oukula$$b4
000908875 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aTadesse, Menfese$$b5
000908875 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGebrehiwot, Mersha$$b6
000908875 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)142357$$aBrüggemann, Nicolas$$b7
000908875 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2682955-1$$a10.3390/land11060784$$gVol. 11, no. 6, p. 784 -$$n6$$p784 -$$tLand$$v11$$x2073-445X$$y2022
000908875 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/908875/files/land-11-00784.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000908875 8767_ $$d2022-07-28$$eAPC$$jZahlung erfolgt
000908875 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:908875$$pdnbdelivery$$popenCost$$pVDB$$pdriver$$pOpenAPC$$popen_access$$popenaire
000908875 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)171851$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000908875 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)142357$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b7$$kFZJ
000908875 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt$$lErde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten$$vFür eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten$$x0
000908875 9141_ $$y2022
000908875 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2020-09-05
000908875 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000908875 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2020-09-05
000908875 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000908875 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2020-09-05
000908875 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2022-11-29
000908875 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2022-11-29
000908875 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2022-08-22T17:01:30Z
000908875 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2022-08-22T17:01:30Z
000908875 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review$$d2022-08-22T17:01:30Z
000908875 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2022-11-29
000908875 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1180$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences$$d2022-11-29
000908875 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0130$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSocial Sciences Citation Index$$d2022-11-29
000908875 915pc $$0PC:(DE-HGF)0000$$2APC$$aAPC keys set
000908875 915pc $$0PC:(DE-HGF)0003$$2APC$$aDOAJ Journal
000908875 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000908875 980__ $$ajournal
000908875 980__ $$aVDB
000908875 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000908875 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000908875 980__ $$aAPC
000908875 9801_ $$aAPC
000908875 9801_ $$aFullTexts