% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Fritsch:909083,
author = {Fritsch, Sebastian J and Blankenheim, Andrea and Wahl,
Alina and Hetfeld, Petra and Maassen, Oliver and Deffge,
Saskia and Kunze, Julian and Rossaint, Rolf and Riedel,
Morris and Marx, Gernot and Bickenbach, Johannes},
title = {{A}ttitudes and perception of artificial intelligence in
healthcare: {A} cross-sectional survey among patients},
journal = {Digital health},
volume = {8},
issn = {2055-2076},
address = {Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.]},
publisher = {Sage},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-03000},
pages = {205520762211167 -},
year = {2022},
abstract = {ObjectiveThe attitudes about the usage of artificial
intelligence in healthcare are controversial. Unlike the
perception of healthcare professionals, the attitudes of
patients and their companions have been of less interest so
far. In this study, we aimed to investigate the perception
of artificial intelligence in healthcare among this highly
relevant group along with the influence of digital affinity
and sociodemographic factors.MethodsWe conducted a
cross-sectional study using a paper-based questionnaire with
patients and their companions at a German tertiary referral
hospital from December 2019 to February 2020. The
questionnaire consisted of three sections examining (a) the
respondents’ technical affinity, (b) their perception of
different aspects of artificial intelligence in healthcare
and (c) sociodemographic characteristics.ResultsFrom a total
of 452 participants, more than $90\%$ already read or heard
about artificial intelligence, but only $24\%$ reported good
or expert knowledge. Asked on their general perception,
$53.18\%$ of the respondents rated the use of artificial
intelligence in medicine as positive or very positive, but
only $4.77\%$ negative or very negative. The respondents
denied concerns about artificial intelligence, but strongly
agreed that artificial intelligence must be controlled by a
physician. Older patients, women, persons with lower
education and technical affinity were more cautious on the
healthcare-related artificial intelligence
usage.ConclusionsGerman patients and their companions are
open towards the usage of artificial intelligence in
healthcare. Although showing only a mediocre knowledge about
artificial intelligence, a majority rated artificial
intelligence in healthcare as positive. Particularly,
patients insist that a physician supervises the artificial
intelligence and keeps ultimate responsibility for diagnosis
and therapy.},
cin = {JSC},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406},
pnm = {5112 - Cross-Domain Algorithms, Tools, Methods Labs (ATMLs)
and Research Groups (POF4-511) / SMITH -
Medizininformatik-Konsortium - Beitrag Forschungszentrum
Jülich (01ZZ1803M)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5112 / G:(BMBF)01ZZ1803M},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {35983102},
UT = {WOS:000839064600001},
doi = {10.1177/20552076221116772},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/909083},
}