001     909291
005     20230123110641.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1038/s41598-022-18142-7
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/31699
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a 35995966
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000844144900037
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2022-03104
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 600
100 1 _ |a Geoerg, Paul
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a How people with disabilities influence crowd dynamics of pedestrian movement through bottlenecks
260 _ _ |a [London]
|c 2022
|b Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1661246354_27938
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Despite considerable research efforts, most controlled empirical studies on crowd movement usually rely on homogeneous crowds, i.e., research participants are typically young adults without disabilities. Consequently, relatively little is known about pedestrian movement in more diverse and heterogeneous crowd conditions, e.g., when persons with reduced mobility are present. This gap may be particularly relevant at bottlenecks, along the path of a moving crowd, that limit the capacity of pedestrian flow. Here, we present results from 12 studies in which participants (total N = 252) with and without visible disabilities moved together in a crowd. In each study, groups of participants walked together in a hallway with a bottleneck at the end. The point of speed adoption, distances between neighbours, and behavioural activities were analysed. We found (1) that participants with disabilities reduced their speed further away from the bottleneck than participants without disabilities; (2) participants without disabilities stayed closer to neighbors with disabilities than to neighbors without disabilities; and (3) participants interacted and communicated with each other to organise in front of the bottleneck. These results underline the importance of studying representative and heterogeneous samples in crowd dynamics. We also argue that more interdisciplinary research is needed to better understand the dynamics of interactions between neighbors in a crowd. A more nuanced understanding of pedestrian dynamics holds the promise of improving the validity of simulation tools such as movement and evacuation models.
536 _ _ |a 5111 - Domain-Specific Simulation & Data Life Cycle Labs (SDLs) and Research Groups (POF4-511)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111
|c POF4-511
|f POF IV
|x 0
536 _ _ |a Verbundprojekt: Sicherheit für Menschen mit körperlicher, geistiger oder altersbedingter Beeinträchtigung (SiME) - Teilvorhaben: Parameterstudien für die sichere Evakuierung heterogener Personengruppen (13N13950)
|0 G:(BMBF)13N13950
|c 13N13950
|x 1
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Schumann, Jette
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)142414
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Boltes, Maik
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)132064
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Kinateder, Max
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
773 _ _ |a 10.1038/s41598-022-18142-7
|g Vol. 12, no. 1, p. 14273
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2615211-3
|n 1
|p 14273
|t Scientific reports
|v 12
|y 2022
|x 2045-2322
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/909291/files/s41598-022-18142-7.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:909291
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)142414
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)132064
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Engineering Digital Futures – Supercomputing, Data Management and Information Security for Knowledge and Action
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-510
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-511
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Enabling Computational- & Data-Intensive Science and Engineering
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2022
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2021-02-03
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2022-11-09
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2022-11-09
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2022-08-08T09:38:07Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2022-08-08T09:38:07Z
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Blind peer review
|d 2022-08-08T09:38:07Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2022-11-09
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2022-11-09
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2022-11-09
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2022-11-09
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2022-11-09
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1040
|2 StatID
|b Zoological Record
|d 2022-11-09
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2022-11-09
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-7-20180321
|k IAS-7
|l Zivile Sicherheitsforschung
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-7-20180321
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21