% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Pozzer:909372,
      author       = {Pozzer, Andrea and Reifenberg, Simon F. and Kumar, Vinod
                      and Franco, Bruno and Kohl, Matthias and Taraborrelli,
                      Domenico and Gromov, Sergey and Ehrhart, Sebastian and
                      Jöckel, Patrick and Sander, Rolf and Fall, Veronica and
                      Rosanka, Simon and Karydis, Vlassis and Akritidis, Dimitris
                      and Emmerichs, Tamara and Crippa, Monica and Guizzardi,
                      Diego and Kaiser, Johannes W. and Clarisse, Lieven and
                      Kiendler-Scharr, Astrid and Tost, Holger and Tsimpidi,
                      Alexandra},
      title        = {{S}imulation of organics in the atmosphere: evaluation of
                      {EMAC}v2.54 with the {M}ainz {O}rganic {M}echanism ({MOM})
                      coupled to the {ORACLE} (v1.0) submodel},
      journal      = {Geoscientific model development},
      volume       = {15},
      number       = {6},
      issn         = {1991-959X},
      address      = {Katlenburg-Lindau},
      publisher    = {Copernicus},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2022-03160},
      pages        = {2673 - 2710},
      year         = {2022},
      abstract     = {An updated and expanded representation of organics in the
                      chemistry general circulation model EMAC (ECHAM5/MESSy for
                      Atmospheric Chemistry) has been evaluated. First, the
                      comprehensive Mainz Organic Mechanism (MOM) in the submodel
                      MECCA (Module Efficiently Calculating the Chemistry of the
                      Atmosphere) was activated with explicit degradation of
                      organic species up to five carbon atoms and a simplified
                      mechanism for larger molecules. Second, the ORACLE submodel
                      (version 1.0) now considers condensation on aerosols for all
                      organics in the mechanism. Parameterizations for aerosol
                      yields are used only for the lumped species that are not
                      included in the explicit mechanism. The simultaneous usage
                      of MOM and ORACLE allows an efficient estimation of not only
                      the chemical degradation of the simulated volatile organic
                      compounds but also the contribution of organics to the
                      growth and fate of (organic) aerosol, with the complexity of
                      the mechanism largely increased compared to EMAC simulations
                      with more simplified chemistry. The model evaluation
                      presented here reveals that the OH concentration is
                      reproduced well globally, whereas significant biases for
                      observed oxygenated organics are present. We also
                      investigate the general properties of the aerosols and their
                      composition, showing that the more sophisticated and
                      process-oriented secondary aerosol formation does not
                      degrade the good agreement of previous model configurations
                      with observations at the surface, allowing further research
                      in the field of gas–aerosol interactions.},
      cin          = {IEK-8},
      ddc          = {550},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013},
      pnm          = {2111 - Air Quality (POF4-211)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2111},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000776575300001},
      doi          = {10.5194/gmd-15-2673-2022},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/909372},
}