000909452 001__ 909452
000909452 005__ 20230123110644.0
000909452 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1002/vzj2.20227
000909452 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1539-1663
000909452 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/32066
000909452 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000847638400001
000909452 037__ $$aFZJ-2022-03198
000909452 082__ $$a550
000909452 1001_ $$00000-0001-9242-2558$$aZhang, Yonggen$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000909452 245__ $$aAnalyzing dual porosity in soil hydraulic properties using soil databases for pedotransfer function development
000909452 260__ $$aHoboken, NJ$$bWiley$$c2022
000909452 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000909452 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000909452 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1666083171_30577
000909452 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000909452 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000909452 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000909452 520__ $$aCurrent databases of soil hydraulic properties (SHPs) have typically been used to develop pedotransfer functions (PTFs) to estimate water retention [θ(h)] assuming a unimodal pore-size distribution. However, natural soils often show the presence of bimodal to multimodal pore-size distributions. Here, we used three widely spread databases for PTF development: UNsaturated SOil hydraulic DAtabase (UNSODA) 2.0, Vereecken, and European hydropedological data inventory (EU-HYDI), to analyze the presence of structural effects in both θ(h) and hydraulic conductivity [K(h)]. Only undisturbed samples were included in the analysis that contained enough datapoints for both θ(h) and K(h) properties, especially in the wet range. One-hundred ninety-two samples were suitable for our analysis, which is only 1% of the total samples in the three databases. Results showed that 65% of the samples exhibited a bimodal pore-size distribution, and bimodality was not limited to fine-textured but also coarser-textured soils. The Mualem–van Genuchten (MvG) expression for both unimodal and bimodal soils was not able to predict the observed unsaturated K. Only a joint fitting of measured θ(h) and K(h) functions provided parameter estimates that were able to describe unsaturated K for uni- and bimodal soils. In addition, we observed a negative relationship between α and n in the case of low sand content (<52%) for both unimodal and bimodal matrix domain properties, contradicting the classical notion. The ratio of α for the macropore and matrix domain was positively correlated with the fraction of macropores and sand content. We anticipate that the results will contribute to deriving PTF for structured soils and avoid unrealistic combinations of MvG parameters.
000909452 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173$$a2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact (POF4-217)$$cPOF4-217$$fPOF IV$$x0
000909452 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
000909452 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129553$$aWeihermüller, Lutz$$b1$$ufzj
000909452 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aToth, Brigitta$$b2
000909452 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)186025$$aNoman, Muhammad$$b3
000909452 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aVereecken, Harry$$b4
000909452 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2088189-7$$a10.1002/vzj2.20227$$n5$$pe20227$$tVadose zone journal$$v21$$x1539-1663$$y2022
000909452 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/909452/files/Vadose%20Zone%20Journal%20-%202022%20-%20Zhang%20-%20Analyzing%20dual%20porosity%20in%20soil%20hydraulic%20properties%20using%20soil%20databases%20for.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000909452 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:909452$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000909452 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129553$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000909452 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
000909452 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt$$lErde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten$$vFür eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten$$x0
000909452 9141_ $$y2022
000909452 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2021-05-04
000909452 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000909452 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)3001$$2StatID$$aDEAL Wiley$$d2021-05-04$$wger
000909452 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2021-05-04
000909452 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2021-05-04
000909452 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000909452 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2021-05-04
000909452 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bVADOSE ZONE J : 2021$$d2022-11-11
000909452 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2022-11-11
000909452 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2022-11-11
000909452 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2021-04-16T15:13:42Z
000909452 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2021-04-16T15:13:42Z
000909452 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review$$d2021-04-16T15:13:42Z
000909452 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2022-11-11
000909452 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2022-11-11
000909452 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences$$d2022-11-11
000909452 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2022-11-11
000909452 920__ $$lyes
000909452 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000909452 980__ $$ajournal
000909452 980__ $$aVDB
000909452 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000909452 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000909452 9801_ $$aFullTexts