000909500 001__ 909500
000909500 005__ 20230123110645.0
000909500 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105823
000909500 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0306-4530
000909500 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1873-3360
000909500 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/33049
000909500 0247_ $$2pmid$$a35689985
000909500 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000818446900011
000909500 037__ $$aFZJ-2022-03206
000909500 082__ $$a610
000909500 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)161350$$aDoppler, Christopher$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000909500 245__ $$aIntranasal oxytocin attenuates the effects of monetary feedback on procedural learning
000909500 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2022
000909500 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000909500 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000909500 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1670842337_16834
000909500 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000909500 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000909500 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000909500 520__ $$aProcedural learning is a vital brain function that allows us to acquire motor skills during development or re-learnthem after lesions affecting the motor system. Procedural learning can be improved by feedback of differentvalence, e.g., monetary or social, mediated by dopaminergic circuits. While processing motivationally relevantstimuli, dopamine interacts closely with oxytocin, whose effects on procedural learning, particularly feedbackbasedapproaches, remain poorly understood. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, weinvestigated whether oxytocin modulates the differential effects of monetary and social feedback on procedurallearning. Sixty-one healthy male participants were randomized to receive a placebo or oxytocin intranasally. Theparticipants then performed a modified serial reaction time task. Oxytocin plasma concentrations were measuredbefore and after applying the placebo or verum. Groups did not differ regarding general reaction times ormeasures of procedural learning. For the placebo group, monetary feedback improved procedural learningcompared to a neutral control condition. In contrast, the oxytocin group did not show a differential effect ofmonetary or social feedback despite a significant increase in oxytocin plasma levels after intranasal application.The data suggest that oxytocin does not influence procedural learning per se. Instead, oxytocin seems toattenuate the effects of monetary feedback on procedural learning specifically.
000909500 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251$$a5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x0
000909500 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
000909500 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)161533$$aMeyer, Linda$$b1
000909500 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)184882$$aSeger, Aline$$b2$$ufzj
000909500 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKarges, Wolfram$$b3
000909500 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131748$$aWeiss-Blankenhorn, Peter$$b4$$ufzj
000909500 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131720$$aFink, Gereon R.$$b5$$ufzj
000909500 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1500706-6$$a10.1016/j.psyneuen.2022.105823$$gVol. 143, p. 105823 -$$p105823 -$$tPsychoneuroendocrinology$$v143$$x0306-4530$$y2022
000909500 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/909500/files/FINK__Doppler_2022_Psychoneuroendocrinology_Intranasal%20oxytocin%20attenuates%20the%20effects%20of%20monetary%20feedback%20on%20procedural%20learning-1.pdf$$yRestricted
000909500 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/909500/files/POSTPRINT.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000909500 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:909500$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000909500 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)161350$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000909500 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)184882$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000909500 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131748$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
000909500 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131720$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b5$$kFZJ
000909500 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x0
000909500 9141_ $$y2022
000909500 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2021-02-02
000909500 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2021-02-02
000909500 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2021-02-02
000909500 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000909500 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2022-11-30$$wger
000909500 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bPSYCHONEUROENDOCRINO : 2021$$d2022-11-30
000909500 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2022-11-30
000909500 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2022-11-30
000909500 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2022-11-30
000909500 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2022-11-30
000909500 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2022-11-30
000909500 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2022-11-30
000909500 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2022-11-30
000909500 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences$$d2022-11-30
000909500 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2022-11-30
000909500 920__ $$lyes
000909500 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406$$kINM-3$$lKognitive Neurowissenschaften$$x0
000909500 980__ $$ajournal
000909500 980__ $$aVDB
000909500 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000909500 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
000909500 9801_ $$aFullTexts