guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Validation methods for energy time series scenarios from deep generative models > print |
| Home > Publications database > Validation methods for energy time series scenarios from deep generative models > print |
| 001 | 909688 | ||
| 005 | 20240712112909.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3141875 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2128/31846 |2 Handle |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000747195700001 |2 WOS |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2022-03341 |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 621.3 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Cramer, Eike |0 P:(DE-Juel1)179591 |b 0 |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Validation methods for energy time series scenarios from deep generative models |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a New York, NY |c 2022 |b IEEE |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1663228249_31072 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a The design and operation of modern energy systems are heavily influenced by time-dependent and uncertain parameters, e.g., renewable electricity generation, load-demand, and electricity prices. These are typically represented by a set of discrete realizations known as scenarios. A popular scenario generation approach uses deep generative models (DGM) that allow scenario generation without prior assumptions about the data distribution. However, the validation of generated scenarios is difficult, and a comprehensive discussion about appropriate validation methods is currently lacking. To start this discussion, we provide a critical assessment of the currently used validation methods in the energy scenario generation literature. In particular, we assess validation methods based on probability density, auto-correlation, and power spectral density. Furthermore, we propose using the multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis (MFDFA) as an additional validation method for non-trivial features like peaks, bursts, and plateaus. As representative examples, we train generative adversarial networks (GANs), Wasserstein GANs (WGANs), and variational autoencoders (VAEs) on two renewable power generation time series (photovoltaic and wind from Germany in 2013 to 2015) and an intra-day electricity price time series form the European Energy Exchange in 2017 to 2019. We apply the four validation methods to both the historical and the generated data and discuss the interpretation of validation results as well as common mistakes, pitfalls, and limitations of the validation methods. Our assessment shows that no single method sufficiently characterizes a scenario but ideally validation should include multiple methods and be interpreted carefully in the context of scenarios over short time periods. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways (POF4-111) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112 |c POF4-111 |f POF IV |x 0 |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 1122 - Design, Operation and Digitalization of the Future Energy Grids (POF4-112) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1122 |c POF4-112 |f POF IV |x 1 |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a HDS LEE - Helmholtz School for Data Science in Life, Earth and Energy (HDS LEE) (HDS-LEE-20190612) |0 G:(DE-Juel1)HDS-LEE-20190612 |c HDS-LEE-20190612 |x 2 |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a HGF-ZT-I-0029 - Helmholtz UQ: Uncertainty Quantification - from data to reliable knowledge (HGF-ZT-I-0029) |0 G:(DE-Ds200)HGF-ZT-I-0029 |c HGF-ZT-I-0029 |x 3 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Gorjao, Leonardo Rydin |0 P:(DE-Juel1)173608 |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Mitsos, Alexander |0 P:(DE-Juel1)172025 |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Schafer, Benjamin |0 0000-0003-1607-9748 |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Witthaut, Dirk |0 P:(DE-Juel1)162277 |b 4 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Dahmen, Manuel |0 P:(DE-Juel1)172097 |b 5 |e Corresponding author |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3141875 |g Vol. 10, p. 8194 - 8207 |0 PERI:(DE-600)2687964-5 |p 8194 - 8207 |t IEEE access |v 10 |y 2022 |x 2169-3536 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/909688/files/Validation_Methods_for_Energy_Time_Series_Scenarios_From_Deep_Generative_Models.pdf |y OpenAccess |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:909688 |p openaire |p open_access |p OpenAPC |p driver |p VDB |p openCost |p dnbdelivery |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 0 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)179591 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 2 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)172025 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 4 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)162277 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 5 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)172097 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Forschungsbereich Energie |l Energiesystemdesign (ESD) |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-110 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-111 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Energiesystemtransformation |9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112 |x 0 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Forschungsbereich Energie |l Energiesystemdesign (ESD) |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-110 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-112 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Digitalisierung und Systemtechnik |9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1122 |x 1 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2022 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160 |2 StatID |b Essential Science Indicators |d 2021-01-28 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1230 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Electronics and Telecommunications Collection |d 2021-01-28 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4 |2 HGFVOC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |d 2021-01-28 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Fees |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700 |2 StatID |d 2021-01-28 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Article Processing Charges |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561 |2 StatID |d 2021-01-28 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b IEEE ACCESS : 2021 |d 2022-11-11 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2022-11-11 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2022-11-11 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501 |2 StatID |b DOAJ Seal |d 2022-06-13T11:44:26Z |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500 |2 StatID |b DOAJ |d 2022-06-13T11:44:26Z |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b DOAJ : Blind peer review |d 2022-06-13T11:44:26Z |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2022-11-11 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology |d 2022-11-11 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2022-11-11 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a IF < 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900 |2 StatID |d 2022-11-11 |
| 915 | p | c | |a APC keys set |2 APC |0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000 |
| 915 | p | c | |a Local Funding |2 APC |0 PC:(DE-HGF)0001 |
| 915 | p | c | |a DFG OA Publikationskosten |2 APC |0 PC:(DE-HGF)0002 |
| 915 | p | c | |a DOAJ Journal |2 APC |0 PC:(DE-HGF)0003 |
| 920 | _ | _ | |l yes |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013 |k IEK-STE |l Systemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung |x 0 |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-10-20170217 |k IEK-10 |l Modellierung von Energiesystemen |x 1 |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-10-20170217 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a APC |
| 981 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-1-20170217 |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|