% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Ficco:909742,
      author       = {Ficco, Linda and Müller, Veronika I. and Kaufmann, Jürgen
                      M. and Schweinberger, Stefan R.},
      title        = {{S}ocio‐cognitive, expertise‐based and
                      appearance‐based accounts of the other‐‘race’ effect
                      in face perception: {A} label‐based systematic review of
                      neuroimaging results},
      journal      = {British journal of psychology},
      volume       = {114},
      number       = {S1},
      issn         = {0007-1269},
      address      = {Oxford},
      publisher    = {Wiley-Blackwell},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2022-03381},
      pages        = {45-69},
      year         = {2023},
      abstract     = {Two competing theories explain the other-‘race’ effect
                      (ORE) either by greater perceptual expertise to
                      same-‘race’ (SR) faces or by social categorization of
                      other-‘race’ (OR) faces at the expense of individuation.
                      To assess expertise and categorization contributions to the
                      ORE, a promising—yet overlooked—approach is comparing
                      activations for different other-‘races’. We present a
                      label-based systematic review of neuroimaging studies
                      reporting increased activity in response to OR faces
                      (African, Caucasian, or Asian) when compared with the SR of
                      participants. Hypothetically, while common activations would
                      reflect general aspects of OR perception,
                      ‘race’-preferential ones would represent effects of
                      ‘race’-specific visual appearance. We find that several
                      studies report activation of occipito-temporal and
                      midcingulate areas in response to faces across different
                      other-‘races’, presumably due to high demand on the
                      visual system and category processing. Another area reported
                      in response to all OR faces, the caudate nucleus, suggests
                      the involvement of socio-affective processes and behavioural
                      regulation. Overall, our results support hybrid
                      models—both expertise and social categorization contribute
                      to the ORE, but they provide little evidence for reduced
                      motivation to process OR faces. Additionally, we identify
                      areas preferentially responding to specific OR faces,
                      reflecting effects of visual appearance.},
      cin          = {INM-7},
      ddc          = {150},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
      pnm          = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
                      (POF4-525)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {36111613},
      UT           = {WOS:000854603100001},
      doi          = {10.1111/bjop.12595},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/909742},
}