001     909862
005     20240708133845.0
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2022-03475
041 _ _ |a English
100 1 _ |a Diaz Gomez, Laura Johana
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)190476
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
111 2 _ |a International Solvent Extraction Conference ISEC 2022
|g ISEC 2022
|c Gothenburg
|d 2022-09-26 - 2022-10-01
|w Sweden
245 _ _ |a Solvent extraction studies of different diastereomers of modified diglycolamide ligands for An(III) and Ln(III) extraction
260 _ _ |c 2022
336 7 _ |a Conference Paper
|0 33
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a INPROCEEDINGS
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a conferenceObject
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a CONFERENCE_POSTER
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Conference Poster
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Poster
|b poster
|m poster
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)24
|s 1664177554_14648
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|x Other
520 _ _ |a BackgroundSolvent extraction is currently the preferred technique for the separation of actinides (An) from fission products (FP), and especially lanthanides (Ln), as constituents of Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) or PUREX raffinate. For this purpose, the separation of minor actinides (MA), especially Am(III) from Cm(III), Eu(III) and other Ln(III) is the current challenge of interest. Nowadays, extractants only made by carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen (CHON principle) are preferred for the extraction of MA, because they can be completely incinerated. Diglycolamides (DGA) showed promising results as extractants for trivalent Ln and An, such as N,N,N’,N’-tetra-n-octyl diglycolamide (TODGA), which usually have a higher affinity for Cm(III) over Am(III). Wilden et al. reported a variation of the Am(III) selectivity over Cm(III) with differently orientated methyl substitutions (syn and anti) in the ligand backbone of Me2-TODGA (Wilden et al., 2019). Here, we study the selectivity and affinity of derivative extractants of TODGA and N,N,N’,N’-tetra-n-decyl diglycolamide (TDDGA) with dipropyl and ethyl-methyl substitutions in the molecule backbone, and their respective diastereomers.MethodsThe experiments were carried out at different nitric acid concentrations (0.8 – 9.8 mol L-1) containing all Ln(III) (except Pm) and other fission products. 241Am, 244Cm, 152Eu and 239Pu(IV) were added as radioactive tracers. The new extractants were tested as 0.1 mol L-1 solution in n-dodecane. The extraction was carried out at 22°C for 30 min. After centrifugation for 5 min., phases were separated by hand using fine-tip pipets. Organic and aqueous phase samples were measured using gamma and alpha spectrometry and ICP-MS.ResultsThe steric hindrance from the alkyl side chains gave generally low distribution ratios (D < 1.5) for the trivalent metal ions. In comparison, Pu(IV) showed remarkably higher distribution ratios at the same HNO3 concentrations (D > 10). The syn-ethyl-methyl substitutions for both analogues showed the highest D values for Am(III) and all metals (except Ru) by all of the tested ligands giving promising molecules for further studies. No third phase formation was observed for any of the ligands. The results of the extraction studies will be presented and discussed in the poster.ConclusionsAmong the tested ligands, syn-ethyl-methyl substitution for both diglycolamides (octyl and decyl side chains) gave the highest D values for all Ln and An. Nevertheless, the D values were much lower than for their unsubstituted parent molecules. Pu(IV) was extracted much better rising the attention for extraction of tetravalent ions. Further studies aim at increasing the D values by e.g., increasing the ligand concentration.ReferencesWilden, A., Kowalski, P. M., Klaß, L., Kraus, B., Kreft, F., Modolo, G., . . . Verboom, W. (2019). Unprecedented Inversion of Selectivity and Extraordinary Difference in the Complexation of Trivalent f-Elements by Diastereomers of a Methylated Diglycolamide. Chem. Eur. J., 25(21), 5507-5513. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201806161
536 _ _ |a 1412 - Predisposal (POF4-141)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1412
|c POF4-141
|f POF IV
|x 0
536 _ _ |a Verbundprojekt: Untersuchungen zur SEParation von AMericium aus hochradioaktiven Abfalllösungen (SEPAM), Teilprojekt A (02E11921A)
|0 G:(BMWi)02E11921A
|c 02E11921A
|x 1
700 1 _ |a Wilden, Andreas
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130438
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Modolo, Giuseppe
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)130383
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Gullo, M. C.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Verboom, Willem
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:909862
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)190476
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130438
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130383
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Nukleare Entsorgung, Sicherheit und Strahlenforschung (NUSAFE II)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-140
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-141
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Nukleare Entsorgung
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1412
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2022
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-6-20101013
|k IEK-6
|l Nukleare Entsorgung und Reaktorsicherheit
|x 0
980 _ _ |a poster
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-6-20101013
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IFN-2-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21