000909898 001__ 909898
000909898 005__ 20230123125731.0
000909898 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/w14193002
000909898 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/32107
000909898 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000867377600001
000909898 037__ $$aFZJ-2022-03506
000909898 041__ $$aEnglish
000909898 082__ $$a690
000909898 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)194437$$aDiouf, Ousmane Coly$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000909898 245__ $$aGroundwater Quality for Irrigation Purposes in the Diass Horst System in Senegal
000909898 260__ $$aBasel$$bMDPI$$c2022
000909898 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000909898 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000909898 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1674463770_23242
000909898 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000909898 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000909898 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000909898 520__ $$aDue to surface water scarcity and variability in rainwater events in the Thies region, Senegal, farmers mostly rely on groundwater resources to improve yield production, although water quality in the hydrosystem and its suitability may be an issue. The objective of this study is to evaluate suitability of the Maastrichtian and Paleocene aquifers located the central western part of Senegal in the Thies region for irrigation purposes. For this purpose, chemical analyses were carried out on the major ions on the Maastrichtian and Paleocene aquifers through a network of 62 sample locations (39 from the Maastrichtian and 23 from the Paleocene) sampled in June 2019. Different water suitability assessment indices were used to evaluate the potential for irrigation, including sodium absorption ration (SAR), percentage of sodium (Na%), permeability index, Kelly ratio (RK), and salinity potential (SP) together with Wilcox and USSL diagrams as methods. The results indicate, that the Ca-Mg-HCO3 water type is dominant in the Maastrichtian aquifer, while in the Paleocene aquifer, HCO3-Ca-Mg and Cl-Ca-Mg are the main water types. The combination of these computed index values indicates that the percentage of suitable water for irrigation purposes accounts for 89.7% and 86.9% of the samples for the Maastrichtian and the Paleocene aquifers, respectively. On the other hand, water samples unsuitable for irrigation purposes range between only 10.3% and 13.1% for the two aquifers
000909898 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173$$a2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact (POF4-217)$$cPOF4-217$$fPOF IV$$x0
000909898 588__ $$aDataset connected to DataCite
000909898 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSarr, Hameth Khassim$$b1
000909898 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDiedhiou, Mathias$$b2
000909898 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129553$$aWeihermüller, Lutz$$b3$$ufzj
000909898 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDieng, Ndeye Maguette$$b4
000909898 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aFaye, Seynabou Cissé$$b5
000909898 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aVereecken, Harry$$b6$$ufzj
000909898 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aFaye, Serigne$$b7
000909898 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2521238-2$$a10.3390/w14193002$$n19$$p3002$$tWater$$v14$$x2073-4441$$y2022
000909898 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/909898/files/water-14-03002-v2.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000909898 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:909898$$popen_access$$popenaire$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB
000909898 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)194437$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000909898 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129553$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000909898 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b6$$kFZJ
000909898 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt$$lErde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten$$vFür eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten$$x0
000909898 9141_ $$y2022
000909898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000909898 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000909898 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNV$$2V:(DE-HGF)$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version)$$bDOAJ$$d2018-08-21T10:51:45Z
000909898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bWATER-SUI : 2021$$d2022-11-11
000909898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2022-11-11
000909898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2022-11-11
000909898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2022-08-29T09:28:13Z
000909898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2022-08-29T09:28:13Z
000909898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review$$d2022-08-29T09:28:13Z
000909898 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNV$$2V:(DE-HGF)$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version)$$bDOAJ$$d2022-08-29T09:28:13Z
000909898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2022-11-11
000909898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2022-11-11
000909898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2022-11-11
000909898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences$$d2022-11-11
000909898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2022-11-11
000909898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2022-11-11
000909898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2022-11-11
000909898 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2022-11-11
000909898 920__ $$lyes
000909898 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000909898 980__ $$ajournal
000909898 980__ $$aVDB
000909898 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000909898 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000909898 9801_ $$aFullTexts