001     909898
005     20230123125731.0
024 7 _ |a 10.3390/w14193002
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/32107
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000867377600001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2022-03506
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 690
100 1 _ |a Diouf, Ousmane Coly
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)194437
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a Groundwater Quality for Irrigation Purposes in the Diass Horst System in Senegal
260 _ _ |a Basel
|c 2022
|b MDPI
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1674463770_23242
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Due to surface water scarcity and variability in rainwater events in the Thies region, Senegal, farmers mostly rely on groundwater resources to improve yield production, although water quality in the hydrosystem and its suitability may be an issue. The objective of this study is to evaluate suitability of the Maastrichtian and Paleocene aquifers located the central western part of Senegal in the Thies region for irrigation purposes. For this purpose, chemical analyses were carried out on the major ions on the Maastrichtian and Paleocene aquifers through a network of 62 sample locations (39 from the Maastrichtian and 23 from the Paleocene) sampled in June 2019. Different water suitability assessment indices were used to evaluate the potential for irrigation, including sodium absorption ration (SAR), percentage of sodium (Na%), permeability index, Kelly ratio (RK), and salinity potential (SP) together with Wilcox and USSL diagrams as methods. The results indicate, that the Ca-Mg-HCO3 water type is dominant in the Maastrichtian aquifer, while in the Paleocene aquifer, HCO3-Ca-Mg and Cl-Ca-Mg are the main water types. The combination of these computed index values indicates that the percentage of suitable water for irrigation purposes accounts for 89.7% and 86.9% of the samples for the Maastrichtian and the Paleocene aquifers, respectively. On the other hand, water samples unsuitable for irrigation purposes range between only 10.3% and 13.1% for the two aquifers
536 _ _ |a 2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact (POF4-217)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173
|c POF4-217
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to DataCite
700 1 _ |a Sarr, Hameth Khassim
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Diedhiou, Mathias
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Weihermüller, Lutz
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129553
|b 3
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Dieng, Ndeye Maguette
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Faye, Seynabou Cissé
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Vereecken, Harry
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129549
|b 6
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Faye, Serigne
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
773 _ _ |a 10.3390/w14193002
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2521238-2
|n 19
|p 3002
|t Water
|v 14
|y 2022
|x 2073-4441
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/909898/files/water-14-03002-v2.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:909898
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)194437
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129553
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129549
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt
|l Erde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Für eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2022
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version)
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNV
|2 V:(DE-HGF)
|b DOAJ
|d 2018-08-21T10:51:45Z
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b WATER-SUI : 2021
|d 2022-11-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2022-11-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2022-11-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2022-08-29T09:28:13Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2022-08-29T09:28:13Z
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Blind peer review
|d 2022-08-29T09:28:13Z
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY (No Version)
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNV
|2 V:(DE-HGF)
|b DOAJ
|d 2022-08-29T09:28:13Z
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2022-11-11
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2022-11-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2022-11-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
|d 2022-11-11
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2022-11-11
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-11
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-11
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-11
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21