000909937 001__ 909937
000909937 005__ 20230123110653.0
000909937 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.121114
000909937 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0009-2541
000909937 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1872-6836
000909937 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/32100
000909937 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000868791500002
000909937 037__ $$aFZJ-2022-03531
000909937 082__ $$a550
000909937 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)177770$$aUhlig, David$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000909937 245__ $$aMagnesium stable isotopes as a potential geochemical tool in agronomy – Constraints and opportunities
000909937 260__ $$aNew York, NY [u.a.]$$bElsevier$$c2022
000909937 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000909937 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000909937 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1666674632_13700
000909937 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000909937 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000909937 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000909937 520__ $$aA sustainable use of soil resources is urgently required to cope with the increasing demand for agricultural products during climate change. To inspire farmers on new soil cultivation methods like subsoil management requires not only yield measurements but also nutrient use efficiency measurements for which analytical tools are still missing. Stable isotopes of the macronutrient magnesium (Mg) are a potential novel subsoil management evaluation tool in agronomy and soil/plant sciences because its isotope ratios shift considerably during Mg uptake by crops. The feasibility of Mg stable isotopes was first demonstrated conceptually by simulating subsoil management on soils with low, middle, and high inventories of bioavailable Mg and crop plants typically cultivated in Germany. This simulation showed that the magnitude of Mg isotope shifts among crops and the exchangeable fraction of Mg in soil is resolvable from the long-term external precision of Mg isotope analyses only if three conditions are met. First, the crop uptake-related Mg isotope fractionation factor should be at the upper end of hitherto published fractionation factors. Second, a high Mg uptake flux of crop plants (e.g., sugar beets) is matched by a low Mg supply from the exchangeable fraction in soil (e.g., sandy soils). Third, subsoil management causes a considerable deepening of the rooting system (e.g., flipping the topsoil root cluster below 30 cm depth). If these conditions are met, Mg stable isotopes can be used in a qualitative manner to identify the main Mg uptake depth, and in a quantitative manner by calculating the Mg use efficiency, defined here as the ratio of Mg uptake versus Mg supply, solely from Mg isotope ratios. This concept was tested for Alfisols on field trials by conducting deep loosening with and without the incorporation of compost. Magnesium isotope shifts in crops and the exchangeable fraction of Mg in soil were mostly unresolvable from the long-term external precision of Mg isotope analyses, which positively tested the Mg isotope concept for well nurtured soils. However, systematic Mg isotope shifts among bulk crops cultivated on and beside a melioration strip were found and attributed to the uplift of isotopically distinct compost-derived Mg on the melioration strip and root restricting layers beside the melioration strip. Given that the Mg isotope composition of the exchangeable fraction barely varies with depth, field-based crop uptake-related ‘apparent’ Mg isotope fractionation factors of winter wheat and spring barley could be determined, which differed from one another (D26Mgwheat-rem.exch. = 0.63 ± 0.05‰, D26Mgbarley-rem.exch. = 0.37 ± 0.12‰). Nonetheless, the quantitative approach of Mg isotopes was violated when calcareous fertilizer was applied to the field as differences in the isotope-derived Mg use efficiency could be attributed to the uneven distribution of lime-derived Mg with depth. Using Mg stable isotopes as a new geochemical routine for agronomy and soil/plant sciences requires future work focussing on isotope fractionation factors related to crop uptake and intra-plant translocation of Mg – which may depend on species, environmental conditions, and nutrient status – to allow minimally invasive sampling of the soil-plant system and to reduce sample sets.
000909937 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173$$a2173 - Agro-biogeosystems: controls, feedbacks and impact (POF4-217)$$cPOF4-217$$fPOF IV$$x0
000909937 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
000909937 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)138881$$aWu, Bei$$b1$$ufzj
000909937 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129438$$aBerns, Anne E.$$b2$$ufzj
000909937 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129427$$aAmelung, Wulf$$b3$$ufzj
000909937 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1492506-0$$a10.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.121114$$gVol. 611, p. 121114 -$$p121114 -$$tChemical geology$$v611$$x0009-2541$$y2022
000909937 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/909937/files/Uhlig%20et%20al.%202022%20authors%20copy-1.pdf$$yPublished on 2022-09-15. Available in OpenAccess from 2024-09-15.
000909937 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:909937$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000909937 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)177770$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000909937 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)138881$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000909937 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129438$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000909937 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129427$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000909937 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-217$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2173$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt$$lErde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten$$vFür eine nachhaltige Bio-Ökonomie – von Ressourcen zu Produkten$$x0
000909937 9141_ $$y2022
000909937 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
000909937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0530$$2StatID$$aEmbargoed OpenAccess
000909937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2021-01-30
000909937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2021-01-30
000909937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2022-11-13$$wger
000909937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bCHEM GEOL : 2021$$d2022-11-13
000909937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2022-11-13
000909937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2022-11-13
000909937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2022-11-13
000909937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2022-11-13
000909937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2022-11-13
000909937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences$$d2022-11-13
000909937 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2022-11-13
000909937 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000909937 980__ $$ajournal
000909937 980__ $$aVDB
000909937 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000909937 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000909937 9801_ $$aFullTexts