001     910215
005     20240712084512.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1002/adom.202101947
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/32043
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000787730700001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2022-03692
082 _ _ |a 670
100 1 _ |a Das, Basita
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)173662
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Effect of Doping, Photodoping, and Bandgap Variation on the Performance of Perovskite Solar Cells
260 _ _ |a Weinheim
|c 2022
|b Wiley-VCH
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1666071419_30574
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Most traditional semiconductor materials are based on the control of doping densities to create junctions and thereby functional and efficient electronic and optoelectronic devices. The technology development for halide perovskites had initially only rarely made use of the concept of electronic doping of the perovskite layer and instead employed a variety of different contact materials to create functionality. Only recently, intentional or unintentional doping of the perovskite layer is more frequently invoked as an important factor explaining differences in photovoltaic or optoelectronic performance in certain devices. Here, numerical simulations are used to study the influence of doping and photodoping on photoluminescence quantum yield and other device relevant metrics. It is found that doping can improve the photoluminescence quantum yield by making radiative recombination faster. This effect can benefit, or harm, photovoltaic performance given that the improvement of photoluminescence quantum efficiency and open-circuit voltage is accompanied by a reduction of the diffusion length. This reduction will eventually lead to inefficient carrier collection at high doping densities. The photovoltaic performance may improve at an optimum doping density which depends on a range of factors such as the mobilities of the different layers and the ratio of the charge carrier capture cross sections.
536 _ _ |a 1215 - Simulations, Theory, Optics, and Analytics (STOA) (POF4-121)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1215
|c POF4-121
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Aguilera, Irene
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)145750
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Rau, Uwe
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)143905
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Kirchartz, Thomas
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)159457
|b 3
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1002/adom.202101947
|g Vol. 10, no. 13, p. 2101947 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2708158-8
|n 13
|p 2101947
|t Advanced optical materials
|v 10
|y 2022
|x 2195-1071
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/910215/files/Advanced%20Optical%20Materials%20-%202022%20-%20Das%20-%20Effect%20of%20Doping%20Photodoping%20and%20Bandgap%20Variation%20on%20the%20Performance%20of.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:910215
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC_DEAL
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)173662
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)145750
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)143905
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)159457
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Materialien und Technologien für die Energiewende (MTET)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-120
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-121
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Photovoltaik und Windenergie
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1215
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2022
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-02-02
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DEAL Wiley
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3001
|2 StatID
|d 2021-02-02
|w ger
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-02-02
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b ADV OPT MATER : 2021
|d 2022-11-10
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2022-11-10
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2022-11-10
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2022-11-10
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
|d 2022-11-10
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2022-11-10
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
|d 2022-11-10
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2022-11-10
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2022-11-10
915 _ _ |a IF >= 10
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9910
|2 StatID
|b ADV OPT MATER : 2021
|d 2022-11-10
915 p c |a APC keys set
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000
915 p c |a Local Funding
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0001
915 p c |a DFG OA Publikationskosten
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0002
915 p c |a DEAL: Wiley 2019
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0120
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-5-20101013
|k IEK-5
|l Photovoltaik
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-5-20101013
980 _ _ |a APC
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IMD-3-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21