% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INBOOK{Heinrichs:910256,
author = {Heinrichs, Bert and Ergin Aslan, Serap},
title = {{I}s the {C}urrent {I}nformed {C}onsent {M}odel {F}lawed?},
address = {Cham.},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-03717},
pages = {549-557},
year = {2022},
comment = {Joel Faintuch, Salomao Faintuch (eds.), Integrity of
Scientific Research},
booktitle = {Joel Faintuch, Salomao Faintuch
(eds.), Integrity of Scientific
Research},
abstract = {Informed consent is a widely acknowledged ethical principle
that plays a crucial role, both in research ethics and
medical ethics. However, empirical findings as well as
theoretical considerations suggest that the current model of
informed consent might be flawed. In particular, the
understanding of information disclosed to patients and
research participants during the consent process proves to
be limited. This, in turn, casts serious doubt on the
validity of the consent. In this paper, we will review the
current state of research on informed consent and discuss
the charge of inadequacy. Subsequently, we will examine some
suggestions that have been presented in the literature to
improve the current model of informed consent. At the end,
we will summarize the current state of the discussion and
give a brief outlook on future developments.},
cin = {INM-7},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
pnm = {5255 - Neuroethics and Ethics of Information (POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)7},
doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-99680-2_55},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/910256},
}