000910342 001__ 910342
000910342 005__ 20240711101512.0
000910342 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s10098-022-02407-w
000910342 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1435-2974
000910342 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1436-722X
000910342 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1618-954X
000910342 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1618-9558
000910342 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/32867
000910342 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000871300800001
000910342 037__ $$aFZJ-2022-03761
000910342 041__ $$aEnglish
000910342 082__ $$a690
000910342 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHaase, M.$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000910342 245__ $$aMulti-criteria decision analysis for prospective sustainability assessment of alternative technologies and fuels for individual motorized transport
000910342 260__ $$aHeidelberg$$bSpringer$$c2022
000910342 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000910342 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000910342 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1669714503_21286
000910342 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000910342 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000910342 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000910342 520__ $$aReducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the transport sector is one of the biggest challenges in the German energy transition. Furthermore, sustainable development does not stop with reducing GHG emissions. Other environmental, social and economic aspects should not be neglected. Thus, here a comprehensive sustainability assessment for passenger vehicles is conducted for 2020 and 2050. The discussed options are an internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV) fuelled with synthetic biofuel and fossil gasoline, a battery electric vehicle (BEV) with electricity from wind power and electricity mix Germany and a fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) with hydrogen from wind power. The life cycle-based assessment entails 13 environmental indicators, one economic and one social indicator. For integrated consideration of the different indicators, the MCDA method Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is chosen. For the assessment, a consistent assessment framework, i.e. background scenario and system boundaries, and a detailed modelling of vehicle production, fuel supply and vehicle use are the cornerstones. The BEV with wind power is the most sustainable option in 2020 as well as in 2050. While in 2020, the second rank is taken by the ICEV with synthetic biofuel from straw and the last rank by the FCEV, in 2050 the FCEV is the runner-up. With the help of MCDA, transparent and structured guidance for decision makers in terms of sustainability assessment of motorized transport options is provided.
000910342 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112$$a1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways (POF4-111)$$cPOF4-111$$fPOF IV$$x0
000910342 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
000910342 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)168163$$aWulf, C.$$b1$$ufzj
000910342 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBaumann, M.$$b2
000910342 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aErsoy, H.$$b3
000910342 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)158005$$aKoj, J. C.$$b4$$ufzj
000910342 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)186000$$aHarzendorf, F.$$b5$$ufzj
000910342 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMesa Estrada, L. S.$$b6
000910342 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2084025-1$$a10.1007/s10098-022-02407-w$$p3171-3197$$tClean technologies and environmental policy$$v24$$x1435-2974$$y2022
000910342 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/910342/files/s10098-022-02407-w.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000910342 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:910342$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000910342 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)168163$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000910342 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)158005$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
000910342 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)186000$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b5$$kFZJ
000910342 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-111$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-110$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Energie$$lEnergiesystemdesign (ESD)$$vEnergiesystemtransformation$$x0
000910342 9141_ $$y2022
000910342 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000910342 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2021-01-27
000910342 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)3002$$2StatID$$aDEAL Springer$$d2021-01-27$$wger
000910342 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000910342 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2021-01-27
000910342 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2022-11-17$$wger
000910342 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2022-11-17
000910342 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2022-11-17
000910342 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology$$d2022-11-17
000910342 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2022-11-17
000910342 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences$$d2022-11-17
000910342 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bCLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR : 2021$$d2022-11-17
000910342 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2022-11-17
000910342 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2022-11-17
000910342 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013$$kIEK-STE$$lSystemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung$$x0
000910342 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013$$kIEK-3$$lTechnoökonomische Systemanalyse$$x1
000910342 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000910342 980__ $$ajournal
000910342 980__ $$aVDB
000910342 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000910342 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
000910342 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013
000910342 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-2-20101013