% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Haase:910342,
      author       = {Haase, M. and Wulf, C. and Baumann, M. and Ersoy, H. and
                      Koj, J. C. and Harzendorf, F. and Mesa Estrada, L. S.},
      title        = {{M}ulti-criteria decision analysis for prospective
                      sustainability assessment of alternative technologies and
                      fuels for individual motorized transport},
      journal      = {Clean technologies and environmental policy},
      volume       = {24},
      issn         = {1435-2974},
      address      = {Heidelberg},
      publisher    = {Springer},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2022-03761},
      pages        = {3171-3197},
      year         = {2022},
      abstract     = {Reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the transport
                      sector is one of the biggest challenges in the German energy
                      transition. Furthermore, sustainable development does not
                      stop with reducing GHG emissions. Other environmental,
                      social and economic aspects should not be neglected. Thus,
                      here a comprehensive sustainability assessment for passenger
                      vehicles is conducted for 2020 and 2050. The discussed
                      options are an internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV)
                      fuelled with synthetic biofuel and fossil gasoline, a
                      battery electric vehicle (BEV) with electricity from wind
                      power and electricity mix Germany and a fuel cell electric
                      vehicle (FCEV) with hydrogen from wind power. The life
                      cycle-based assessment entails 13 environmental indicators,
                      one economic and one social indicator. For integrated
                      consideration of the different indicators, the MCDA method
                      Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal
                      Solution (TOPSIS) is chosen. For the assessment, a
                      consistent assessment framework, i.e. background scenario
                      and system boundaries, and a detailed modelling of vehicle
                      production, fuel supply and vehicle use are the
                      cornerstones. The BEV with wind power is the most
                      sustainable option in 2020 as well as in 2050. While in
                      2020, the second rank is taken by the ICEV with synthetic
                      biofuel from straw and the last rank by the FCEV, in 2050
                      the FCEV is the runner-up. With the help of MCDA,
                      transparent and structured guidance for decision makers in
                      terms of sustainability assessment of motorized transport
                      options is provided.},
      cin          = {IEK-STE / IEK-3},
      ddc          = {690},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013 / I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013},
      pnm          = {1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways
                      (POF4-111)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000871300800001},
      doi          = {10.1007/s10098-022-02407-w},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/910342},
}