001     910342
005     20240711101512.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1007/s10098-022-02407-w
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1435-2974
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1436-722X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1618-954X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1618-9558
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/32867
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000871300800001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2022-03761
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 690
100 1 _ |a Haase, M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Multi-criteria decision analysis for prospective sustainability assessment of alternative technologies and fuels for individual motorized transport
260 _ _ |a Heidelberg
|c 2022
|b Springer
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1669714503_21286
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the transport sector is one of the biggest challenges in the German energy transition. Furthermore, sustainable development does not stop with reducing GHG emissions. Other environmental, social and economic aspects should not be neglected. Thus, here a comprehensive sustainability assessment for passenger vehicles is conducted for 2020 and 2050. The discussed options are an internal combustion engine vehicle (ICEV) fuelled with synthetic biofuel and fossil gasoline, a battery electric vehicle (BEV) with electricity from wind power and electricity mix Germany and a fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) with hydrogen from wind power. The life cycle-based assessment entails 13 environmental indicators, one economic and one social indicator. For integrated consideration of the different indicators, the MCDA method Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is chosen. For the assessment, a consistent assessment framework, i.e. background scenario and system boundaries, and a detailed modelling of vehicle production, fuel supply and vehicle use are the cornerstones. The BEV with wind power is the most sustainable option in 2020 as well as in 2050. While in 2020, the second rank is taken by the ICEV with synthetic biofuel from straw and the last rank by the FCEV, in 2050 the FCEV is the runner-up. With the help of MCDA, transparent and structured guidance for decision makers in terms of sustainability assessment of motorized transport options is provided.
536 _ _ |a 1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways (POF4-111)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112
|c POF4-111
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Wulf, C.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)168163
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Baumann, M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Ersoy, H.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Koj, J. C.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)158005
|b 4
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Harzendorf, F.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)186000
|b 5
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Mesa Estrada, L. S.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
773 _ _ |a 10.1007/s10098-022-02407-w
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2084025-1
|p 3171-3197
|t Clean technologies and environmental policy
|v 24
|y 2022
|x 1435-2974
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/910342/files/s10098-022-02407-w.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:910342
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)168163
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)158005
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)186000
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Energiesystemdesign (ESD)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-110
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-111
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Energiesystemtransformation
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2022
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DEAL Springer
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3002
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-27
|w ger
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-17
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR : 2021
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-17
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
|k IEK-STE
|l Systemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013
|k IEK-3
|l Technoökonomische Systemanalyse
|x 1
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-2-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21