000910523 001__ 910523
000910523 005__ 20230123110708.0
000910523 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172301
000910523 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/32195
000910523 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000793810600001
000910523 037__ $$aFZJ-2022-03906
000910523 041__ $$aEnglish
000910523 082__ $$a621.3
000910523 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)177985$$aRüttgers, Mario$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000910523 245__ $$aPrediction of Typhoon Track and Intensity Using a Generative Adversarial Network With Observational and Meteorological Data
000910523 260__ $$aNew York, NY$$bIEEE$$c2022
000910523 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000910523 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000910523 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1666956224_8175
000910523 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000910523 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000910523 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000910523 520__ $$aTo save lives and reduce damage from the destructive impacts of a typhoon, an accurate and fast forecast method is highly demanded. Particularly, predictions for short lead times, known as nowcasting, rely on fast forecasts allowing immediate emergency plannings in the affected areas. In this paper, we propose a generative adversarial network that operates on a single graphics processing unit, to predict both the track and intensity of typhoons for short lead times within fractions of a second. To investigate the effects of meteorological variables on typhoon forecasts, we conducted a parameter study for 6-h track predictions. The results of the study indicate that learning velocity, temperature, pressure, and humidity along with satellite images have positive effects on prediction accuracy. To address the limited access to observational data and facilitate predictions for 12-h intervals, we replaced satellite images with reanalysis data of the total cloud cover and vorticity fields. This replacement led to an increase in data from 76 to 757 typhoons, and it reduced the error of the 6-h track forecasts by 23.5%. The best combination of the parameter study yields track predictions in intervals of 6 and 12 h with the corresponding averaged absolute errors of 44.5 and 68.7 km. Typhoon intensities are predicted by extracting information from generated velocity fields with averaged hit rates of 87.3% and 83.2% for 6- and 12-h interval forecasts, respectively. For typhoons after 1994, tracks and intensities for 12-h intervals are compared to forecasts from the Joint Typhoon Warning Center and Regional Specialized Meteorological Center Tokyo.
000910523 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111$$a5111 - Domain-Specific Simulation & Data Life Cycle Labs (SDLs) and Research Groups (POF4-511)$$cPOF4-511$$fPOF IV$$x0
000910523 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)HDS-LEE-20190612$$aHDS LEE - Helmholtz School for Data Science in Life, Earth and Energy (HDS LEE) (HDS-LEE-20190612)$$cHDS-LEE-20190612$$x1
000910523 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSoohwan, Jeon$$b1
000910523 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSangseung, Lee$$b2
000910523 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDonghyun, You$$b3
000910523 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2687964-5$$a10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3172301$$p48434-48446$$tIEEE access$$v10$$x2169-3536$$y2022
000910523 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/910523/files/2022_IEEE_access_Prediction_of_Typhoon_Track_an%20d_Intensity_Using_a_Generative_Adversarial_Network_With_Observational_and_Meteorological_Data.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000910523 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:910523$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000910523 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)177985$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000910523 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-511$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-510$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lEngineering Digital Futures – Supercomputing, Data Management and Information Security for Knowledge and Action$$vEnabling Computational- & Data-Intensive Science and Engineering$$x0
000910523 9141_ $$y2022
000910523 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2021-01-28
000910523 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1230$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Electronics and Telecommunications Collection$$d2021-01-28
000910523 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
000910523 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2021-01-28
000910523 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2021-01-28
000910523 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000910523 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2021-01-28
000910523 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bIEEE ACCESS : 2021$$d2022-11-11
000910523 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2022-11-11
000910523 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2022-11-11
000910523 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2022-06-13T11:44:26Z
000910523 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2022-06-13T11:44:26Z
000910523 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review$$d2022-06-13T11:44:26Z
000910523 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2022-11-11
000910523 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology$$d2022-11-11
000910523 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2022-11-11
000910523 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2022-11-11
000910523 920__ $$lno
000910523 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406$$kJSC$$lJülich Supercomputing Center$$x0
000910523 980__ $$ajournal
000910523 980__ $$aVDB
000910523 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000910523 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406
000910523 9801_ $$aFullTexts