000910684 001__ 910684
000910684 005__ 20230228121558.0
000910684 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108761
000910684 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1470-160X
000910684 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1872-7034
000910684 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/33802
000910684 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000778350200003
000910684 037__ $$aFZJ-2022-04056
000910684 082__ $$a630
000910684 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchenk, Janina$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000910684 245__ $$aSuitability of molecular taxonomy for assessing polluted sediments using the NemaSPEAR[%] index
000910684 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2022
000910684 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000910684 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000910684 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1675058013_19837
000910684 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000910684 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000910684 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000910684 520__ $$aAssessing the ecological consequences of marine and freshwater contamination is an important use of biological indicators. The NemaSPEAR[%] index is a nematode-based index for the evaluation of sediment quality and an expedient complement to macroinvertebrate-based indicator systems, especially for fine, cohesive sediments. While the NemaSPEAR[%] index in its original form is morphologically based, in this study the nematode communities of 38 locations with known sediment contamination were analyzed by light microscopy and metabarcoding to demonstrate the validity of a molecular-taxonomy-based NemaSPEAR[%] index. The results showed that the molecular-based index can reliably distinguish between sites of good, moderate, and bad pollution status. Moreover, a greater congruence with molecular read abundances were obtained after the morphology-based NemaSPEAR[%] index was corrected for differences in the biomass of different nematode species. However, incomplete reference databases hamper a full congruence between the species inventories recorded in morphological and molecular datasets. Another source of variability is the substantial difference in the biomass (and thus also of gene copies) of different species, thus evidencing a bias in abundance-based calculations of the NemaSPEAR[%] index. Despite these limitations, the molecular approach provides an expertise-free means of reliable bioindication using one of the most abundant and diverse components of benthic macroinvertebrate communities. Moreover, due to the ubiquity of nematodes, application of the index can be extended to wastewater, biofilm, and other lotic and lentic waters that require regular monitoring.
000910684 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899$$a899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)$$cPOF4-899$$fPOF IV$$x0
000910684 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
000910684 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHöss, Sebastian$$b1
000910684 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)192343$$aKleinbölting, Nils$$b2
000910684 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aTraunspurger, Walter$$b3
000910684 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2063587-4$$a10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108761$$gVol. 137, p. 108761 -$$p108761 -$$tEcological indicators$$v137$$x1470-160X$$y2022
000910684 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/910684/files/1-s2.0-S1470160X22002321-main.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000910684 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:910684$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000910684 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)192343$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000910684 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-890$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-800$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bProgrammungebundene Forschung$$lohne Programm$$vohne Topic$$x0
000910684 9141_ $$y2022
000910684 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2021-02-04
000910684 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2021-02-04
000910684 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2021-02-04
000910684 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1190$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBiological Abstracts$$d2021-02-04
000910684 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2021-02-04
000910684 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1040$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bZoological Record$$d2021-02-04
000910684 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences$$d2021-02-04
000910684 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
000910684 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2021-02-04
000910684 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2021-02-04
000910684 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000910684 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2021-02-04
000910684 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bECOL INDIC : 2019$$d2021-02-04
000910684 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2021-02-04
000910684 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2021-02-04
000910684 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2021-02-04$$wger
000910684 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2021-02-04
000910684 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-5-20220217$$kIBG-5$$lComputergestütze Metagenomik$$x0
000910684 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000910684 980__ $$ajournal
000910684 980__ $$aVDB
000910684 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000910684 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-5-20220217