001     910685
005     20230228121558.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108435
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/33804
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a 35845101
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000828066500003
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2022-04057
082 _ _ |a 570
100 1 _ |a Uszkoreit, Julian
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)192371
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a Dataset containing physiological amounts of spike-in proteins into murine C2C12 background as a ground truth quantitative LC-MS/MS reference
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2022
|b Elsevier
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1675058409_21129
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a In this article, we present a data dependent acquisition (DDA) dataset which was generated as a reference and ground truth quantitative dataset. While initially used to compare samples measured with DDA and data independent acquisition (DIA) (Barkovits et al., 2020), the presented dataset holds potential value as a benchmark reference for any workflows working on DDA data. The entire dataset consists of 15 LC-MS/MS measurements composed of five distinct spike-in-states, each with three replicates. To generate the data set, a C2C12 (immortalized mouse myoblast) cell lysate was used as a complex background for five different states which were simulated by spiking 13 defined proteins at different concentrations. For this purpose, the cell lysate was used in a constant amount of 20 µg for all samples and different amounts of the 13 selected proteins ranging from 0.1 to 10 pmol were added, reflecting physiological amounts of proteins. Afterwards, all samples were tryptically digested using the same method. From each sample 200 ng tryptic peptides were measured in triplicates on a Q Exactive HF (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The mass range for MS1 was set to 350–1400 m/z with a resolution of 60,000 at 200 m/z. HCD fragmentation of the Top10 abundant precursor ions was performed at 27% NCE. The fragment analysis (MS2) was performed with a resolution of 30,000 at 200 m/z.
536 _ _ |a 899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899
|c POF4-899
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Barkovits, Katalin
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Pacharra, Sandra
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Pfeiffer, Kathy
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Steinbach, Simone
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Marcus, Katrin
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Eisenacher, Martin
|0 0000-0003-2687-7444
|b 6
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.dib.2022.108435
|g Vol. 43, p. 108435 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2786545-9
|p 108435 -
|t Data in Brief
|v 43
|y 2022
|x 2352-3409
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/910685/files/1-s2.0-S2352340922006321-main.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:910685
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)192371
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Programmungebundene Forschung
|l ohne Programm
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-890
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-800
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v ohne Topic
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2022
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2020-08-31
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
|d 2020-08-31
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1190
|2 StatID
|b Biological Abstracts
|d 2020-08-31
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0112
|2 StatID
|b Emerging Sources Citation Index
|d 2020-08-31
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2020-08-31
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2020-08-31
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2020-08-31
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2020-08-31
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Peer review
|d 2020-08-31
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|d 2020-08-31
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2020-08-31
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
|d 2020-08-31
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2020-08-31
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-5-20220217
|k IBG-5
|l Computergestütze Metagenomik
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-5-20220217


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21