% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hoffmann:910686,
author = {Hoffmann, Nils and Mayer, Gerhard and Has, Canan and
Kopczynski, Dominik and Al Machot, Fadi and Schwudke,
Dominik and Ahrends, Robert and Marcus, Katrin and
Eisenacher, Martin and Turewicz, Michael},
title = {{A} {C}urrent {E}ncyclopedia of {B}ioinformatics {T}ools,
{D}ata {F}ormats and {R}esources for {M}ass {S}pectrometry
{L}ipidomics},
journal = {Metabolites},
volume = {12},
number = {7},
issn = {2218-1989},
address = {Basel},
publisher = {MDPI},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-04058},
pages = {584 -},
year = {2022},
abstract = {Mass spectrometry is a widely used technology to identify
and quantify biomolecules such as lipids, metabolites and
proteins necessary for biomedical research. In this study,
we catalogued freely available software tools, libraries,
databases, repositories and resources that support
lipidomics data analysis and determined the scope of
currently used analytical technologies. Because of the
tremendous importance of data interoperability, we assessed
the support of standardized data formats in mass
spectrometric (MS)-based lipidomics workflows. We included
tools in our comparison that support targeted as well as
untargeted analysis using direct infusion/shotgun (DI-MS),
liquid chromatography−mass spectrometry, ion mobility or
MS imaging approaches on MS1 and potentially higher MS
levels. As a result, we determined that the Human Proteome
Organization-Proteomics Standards Initiative standard data
formats, mzML and mzTab-M, are already supported by a
substantial number of recent software tools. We further
discuss how mzTab-M can serve as a bridge between data
acquisition and lipid bioinformatics tools for
interpretation, capturing their output and transmitting rich
annotated data for downstream processing. However, we
identified several challenges of currently available tools
and standards. Potential areas for improvement were:
adaptation of common nomenclature and standardized reporting
to enable high throughput lipidomics and improve its data
handling. Finally, we suggest specific areas where tools and
repositories need to improve to become FAIRer.},
cin = {IBG-5},
ddc = {540},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-5-20220217},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {35888710},
UT = {WOS:000831792900001},
doi = {10.3390/metabo12070584},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/910686},
}