000910731 001__ 910731
000910731 005__ 20230123110717.0
000910731 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3389/fpsyg.2022.946626
000910731 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/32269
000910731 0247_ $$2pmid$$a36059769
000910731 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000849206400001
000910731 037__ $$aFZJ-2022-04101
000910731 082__ $$a150
000910731 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchumann, Frank$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000910731 245__ $$aOn doing multi-act arithmetic: A multitrait-multimethod approach of performance dimensions in integrated multitasking
000910731 260__ $$aLausanne$$bFrontiers Research Foundation$$c2022
000910731 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000910731 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000910731 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1667392492_26491
000910731 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000910731 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000910731 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000910731 520__ $$aHere we present a systematic plan to the experimental study of test-retest reliability in the multitasking domain, adopting the multitrait-multimethod (MTMM) approach to evaluate the psychometric properties of performance in Düker-type speeded multiple-act mental arithmetic. These form of tasks capacitate the experimental analysis of integrated multi-step processing by combining multiple mental operations in flexible ways in the service of the overarching goal of completing the task. A particular focus was on scoring methodology, particularly measures of response speed variability. To this end, we present data of two experiments with regard to (a) test-retest reliability, (b) between-measures correlational structure, (c) and stability (test-retest practice effects). Finally, we compared participants with high versus low performance variability to assess ability-related differences in measurement precision (typically used as proxy to "simulate" patient populations), which is especially relevant in the applied fields of clinical neuropsychology. The participants performed two classic integrated multi-act arithmetic tasks, combining addition and verification (Exp. 1) and addition and comparison (Exp. 2). The results revealed excellent test-retest reliability for the standard and the variability measures. The analysis of between-measures correlational structure revealed the typical pattern of convergent and discriminant relationships, and also, that absolute response speed variability was highly correlated with average speed (r > 0.85), indicating that these measures mainly deliver redundant information. In contrast, speed-adjusted (relativized) variability revealed discriminant validity being correlated to a much lesser degree with average speed, indicating that this measure delivers additional information not already provided by the speed measure. Furthermore, speed-adjusted variability was virtually unaffected by test-retest practice, which makes this measure interesting in situations with repeated testing.
000910731 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251$$a5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x0
000910731 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
000910731 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSteinborn, Michael B.$$b1
000910731 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aFlehmig, Hagen C.$$b2
000910731 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKürten, Jens$$b3
000910731 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131693$$aLangner, Robert$$b4$$ufzj
000910731 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHuestegge, Lynn$$b5
000910731 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2563826-9$$a10.3389/fpsyg.2022.946626$$gVol. 13, p. 946626$$p946626$$tFrontiers in psychology$$v13$$x1664-1078$$y2022
000910731 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/910731/files/fpsyg-13-946626.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000910731 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:910731$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000910731 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131693$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
000910731 9101_ $$0I:(DE-HGF)0$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131693$$a HHU Düsseldorf$$b4
000910731 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x0
000910731 9141_ $$y2022
000910731 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2021-01-30
000910731 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000910731 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2021-01-30
000910731 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000910731 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2021-01-30
000910731 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bFRONT PSYCHOL : 2021$$d2022-11-29
000910731 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2022-11-29
000910731 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2022-11-29
000910731 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2021-05-12T11:55:44Z
000910731 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2021-05-12T11:55:44Z
000910731 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review$$d2021-05-12T11:55:44Z
000910731 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2022-11-29
000910731 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1180$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences$$d2022-11-29
000910731 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1110$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Clinical Medicine$$d2022-11-29
000910731 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0130$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSocial Sciences Citation Index$$d2022-11-29
000910731 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2022-11-29
000910731 920__ $$lyes
000910731 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406$$kINM-7$$lGehirn & Verhalten$$x0
000910731 980__ $$ajournal
000910731 980__ $$aVDB
000910731 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000910731 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406
000910731 9801_ $$aFullTexts