% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Gils:910946,
      author       = {Gils, Hans Christian and Linßen, Jochen and Möst, Dominik
                      and Weber, Christoph},
      title        = {{I}mprovement of model-based energy systems analysis
                      through systematic model experiments},
      journal      = {Renewable $\&$ sustainable energy reviews},
      volume       = {167},
      issn         = {1364-0321},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2022-04274},
      pages        = {112804 -},
      year         = {2022},
      abstract     = {This Virtual Special Issue collects the results of six
                      research projects conducted under the umbrella of the MODEX
                      network. MODEX stands for Model Experiments and refers to
                      the combination of qualitative and quantitative model
                      comparisons, the latter based on a harmonized model
                      application. While all projects focused on the comparison of
                      energy system models, the experiments covered a broad range
                      of different areas. Thus, the experiments address different
                      model types, such as vehicle diffusion models, power system
                      models, distribution grid models, and transmission grid
                      models, but also different thematic scopes, such as policy
                      instruments, decentralized flexibility, and sector coupling.
                      In total, the projects involved 40 models. The experiments
                      were based on a harmonization of models and data, which was
                      realized to the degree possible and useful in the respective
                      project context. Complementary to the harmonized model
                      application, the methods and tools for the systematic
                      comparison of energy system models were further developed
                      within the MODEX projects. The results of the MODEX projects
                      significantly expand the spectrum of systematic comparisons
                      of energy system models. The added value compared to
                      previous model experiments consists particularly in the
                      profound characterization of the models involved, the
                      consistent linking of model differences with outcome
                      differences, and the transparent description of appropriate
                      methods and challenges of comparing energy system models.
                      Due to a high degree of transparency, the project findings
                      can be used directly by developers and users of other
                      models},
      cin          = {IEK-3},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013},
      pnm          = {1111 - Effective System Transformation Pathways (POF4-111)
                      / 1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways
                      (POF4-111)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1111 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000850880100002},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.rser.2022.112804},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/910946},
}