% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Gils:910946,
author = {Gils, Hans Christian and Linßen, Jochen and Möst, Dominik
and Weber, Christoph},
title = {{I}mprovement of model-based energy systems analysis
through systematic model experiments},
journal = {Renewable $\&$ sustainable energy reviews},
volume = {167},
issn = {1364-0321},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-04274},
pages = {112804 -},
year = {2022},
abstract = {This Virtual Special Issue collects the results of six
research projects conducted under the umbrella of the MODEX
network. MODEX stands for Model Experiments and refers to
the combination of qualitative and quantitative model
comparisons, the latter based on a harmonized model
application. While all projects focused on the comparison of
energy system models, the experiments covered a broad range
of different areas. Thus, the experiments address different
model types, such as vehicle diffusion models, power system
models, distribution grid models, and transmission grid
models, but also different thematic scopes, such as policy
instruments, decentralized flexibility, and sector coupling.
In total, the projects involved 40 models. The experiments
were based on a harmonization of models and data, which was
realized to the degree possible and useful in the respective
project context. Complementary to the harmonized model
application, the methods and tools for the systematic
comparison of energy system models were further developed
within the MODEX projects. The results of the MODEX projects
significantly expand the spectrum of systematic comparisons
of energy system models. The added value compared to
previous model experiments consists particularly in the
profound characterization of the models involved, the
consistent linking of model differences with outcome
differences, and the transparent description of appropriate
methods and challenges of comparing energy system models.
Due to a high degree of transparency, the project findings
can be used directly by developers and users of other
models},
cin = {IEK-3},
ddc = {620},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013},
pnm = {1111 - Effective System Transformation Pathways (POF4-111)
/ 1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways
(POF4-111)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1111 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000850880100002},
doi = {10.1016/j.rser.2022.112804},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/910946},
}