000911052 001__ 911052
000911052 005__ 20230929112458.0
000911052 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1007/s11065-022-09552-5
000911052 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1040-7308
000911052 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1573-6660
000911052 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/34409
000911052 0247_ $$2pmid$$a35906511
000911052 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000832802100001
000911052 037__ $$aFZJ-2022-04378
000911052 082__ $$a610
000911052 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)179395$$aHüpen, Philippa$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000911052 245__ $$aA Systematic Review on Common and Distinct Neural Correlates of Risk-taking in Substance-related and Non-substance Related Addictions
000911052 260__ $$aDordrecht [u.a.]$$bSpringer Science + Business Media B.V$$c2023
000911052 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000911052 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000911052 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1684219992_3440
000911052 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000911052 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000911052 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000911052 520__ $$aBoth substance-related as well as non-substance-related addictions may include recurrent engagement in risky actions despite adverse outcomes. We here apply a unified approach and review task-based neuroimaging studies on substance-related (SRAs) and non-substance related addictions (NSRAs) to examine commonalities and differences in neural correlates of risk-taking in these two addiction types. To this end, we conducted a systematic review adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. Two databases were searched with predefined search terms to identify neuroimaging studies on risk-taking tasks in individuals with addiction disorders. In total, 19 studies on SRAs (comprising a total of 648 individuals with SRAs) and 10 studies on NSRAs (comprising a total of 187 individuals with NSRAs) were included. Risk-related brain activation in SRAs and NSRAs was summarized individually and subsequently compared to each other. Results suggest convergent altered risk-related neural processes, including hyperactivity in the OFC and the striatum. As characteristic for both addiction types, these brain regions may represent an underlying mechanism of suboptimal decision-making. In contrast, decreased DLPFC activity may be specific to SRAs and decreased IFG activity could only be identified for NSRAs. The precuneus and posterior cingulate show elevated activity in SRAs, while findings regarding these areas were mixed in NSRAs. Additional scarce evidence suggests decreased ventral ACC activity and increased dorsal ACC activity in both addiction types. Associations between identified activation patterns with drug use severity underpin the clinical relevance of these findings. However, this exploratory evidence should be interpreted with caution and should be regarded as preliminary. Future research is needed to evaluate the findings gathered by this review.
000911052 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252$$a5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525)$$cPOF4-525$$fPOF IV$$x0
000911052 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de
000911052 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)172840$$aHabel, Ute$$b1
000911052 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)166584$$aVotinov, Mikhail$$b2
000911052 7001_ $$00000-0001-6495-9040$$aKable, Joseph W.$$b3
000911052 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)172866$$aWagels, Lisa$$b4
000911052 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2018507-8$$a10.1007/s11065-022-09552-5$$p492-513$$tNeuropsychology review$$v33$$x1040-7308$$y2023
000911052 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/911052/files/s11065-022-09552-5.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000911052 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:911052$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000911052 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)172840$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000911052 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)166584$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b2$$kFZJ
000911052 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-525$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-520$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lNatural, Artificial and Cognitive Information Processing$$vDecoding Brain Organization and Dysfunction$$x0
000911052 9141_ $$y2023
000911052 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2021-02-02
000911052 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000911052 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2021-02-02
000911052 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)3002$$2StatID$$aDEAL Springer$$d2021-02-02$$wger
000911052 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000911052 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz$$d2023-08-25$$wger
000911052 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bNEUROPSYCHOL REV : 2022$$d2023-08-25
000911052 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2023-08-25
000911052 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2023-08-25
000911052 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search$$d2023-08-25
000911052 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC$$d2023-08-25
000911052 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2023-08-25
000911052 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews$$d2023-08-25
000911052 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2023-08-25
000911052 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1120$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Reviews Reports And Meetings$$d2023-08-25
000911052 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0130$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSocial Sciences Citation Index$$d2023-08-25
000911052 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bNEUROPSYCHOL REV : 2022$$d2023-08-25
000911052 920__ $$lyes
000911052 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113$$kINM-10$$lJara-Institut Brain structure-function relationships$$x0
000911052 980__ $$ajournal
000911052 980__ $$aVDB
000911052 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000911052 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113
000911052 9801_ $$aFullTexts