% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Hpen:911052,
      author       = {Hüpen, Philippa and Habel, Ute and Votinov, Mikhail and
                      Kable, Joseph W. and Wagels, Lisa},
      title        = {{A} {S}ystematic {R}eview on {C}ommon and {D}istinct
                      {N}eural {C}orrelates of {R}isk-taking in
                      {S}ubstance-related and {N}on-substance {R}elated
                      {A}ddictions},
      journal      = {Neuropsychology review},
      volume       = {33},
      issn         = {1040-7308},
      address      = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2022-04378},
      pages        = {492-513},
      year         = {2023},
      abstract     = {Both substance-related as well as non-substance-related
                      addictions may include recurrent engagement in risky actions
                      despite adverse outcomes. We here apply a unified approach
                      and review task-based neuroimaging studies on
                      substance-related (SRAs) and non-substance related
                      addictions (NSRAs) to examine commonalities and differences
                      in neural correlates of risk-taking in these two addiction
                      types. To this end, we conducted a systematic review
                      adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. Two databases were
                      searched with predefined search terms to identify
                      neuroimaging studies on risk-taking tasks in individuals
                      with addiction disorders. In total, 19 studies on SRAs
                      (comprising a total of 648 individuals with SRAs) and 10
                      studies on NSRAs (comprising a total of 187 individuals with
                      NSRAs) were included. Risk-related brain activation in SRAs
                      and NSRAs was summarized individually and subsequently
                      compared to each other. Results suggest convergent altered
                      risk-related neural processes, including hyperactivity in
                      the OFC and the striatum. As characteristic for both
                      addiction types, these brain regions may represent an
                      underlying mechanism of suboptimal decision-making. In
                      contrast, decreased DLPFC activity may be specific to SRAs
                      and decreased IFG activity could only be identified for
                      NSRAs. The precuneus and posterior cingulate show elevated
                      activity in SRAs, while findings regarding these areas were
                      mixed in NSRAs. Additional scarce evidence suggests
                      decreased ventral ACC activity and increased dorsal ACC
                      activity in both addiction types. Associations between
                      identified activation patterns with drug use severity
                      underpin the clinical relevance of these findings. However,
                      this exploratory evidence should be interpreted with caution
                      and should be regarded as preliminary. Future research is
                      needed to evaluate the findings gathered by this review.},
      cin          = {INM-10},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113},
      pnm          = {5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity (POF4-525)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {35906511},
      UT           = {WOS:000832802100001},
      doi          = {10.1007/s11065-022-09552-5},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/911052},
}