001     911322
005     20230316201803.0
024 7 _ |a 2128/34146
|2 Handle
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2022-04614
041 _ _ |a English
100 1 _ |a Seyfried, Armin
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)132266
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
111 2 _ |a Traffic and Granular Flow 2022
|g TGF2022
|c IIT New Delhi
|d 2022-10-15 - 2022-10-17
|w India
245 _ _ |a Pedestrian fundamental diagrams and continuity equation
260 _ _ |c 2022
336 7 _ |a Conference Paper
|0 33
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a Other
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a INPROCEEDINGS
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a conferenceObject
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a LECTURE_SPEECH
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Conference Presentation
|b conf
|m conf
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)6
|s 1678954216_11093
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|x After Call
520 _ _ |a The relationship between density ρ flow J and velocity v of pedestrian streams is of central importance for describing the performance of facilities for pedestrian traffic. For these relations the term fundamental diagram is used, if they base on temporal or spatial averages J, v and ρ gained by empirical measurements of a system in a steady state. In manuals, standards and guidelines, the following forms are used for representing the fundamental diagram: averages v (ρ ), J (v ) and J (ρ ). For the comparison of fundamental diagrams of systems of different widths and for the transformation of these different representations, the concept of the specific flow J_s= J⁄b where b is the width of the facility and the flow equation J= ρ∙v∙b are used. It is assumed that the specific flow J_s=ρ∙v is independent of the width of the facility.In this contribution, the state of the art is summarized for fundamental diagrams of unidirectional, bidirectional and multidirectional flows. Most studies base on trajectories of the head, enabling even microscopic measurements of the ρ, J and v. The comparison of the data in the literature shows that up to now there are inconsistencies and discrepancies between different studies and measurement methods, in particular at the congested branch of the fundamental diagram, see Figure and [1,4]. Measurements of bidirectional and multidirectional flows at high densities give unexpectedly high flows and most studies do not indicate that a standstill occurs due to a high density. In a critical discussion it is analysed which problems arise from an oversimplified use of the flow equation and how measurements of ρ, J and v have to be performed to be in consistency with the continuity equation.
536 _ _ |a 5111 - Domain-Specific Simulation & Data Life Cycle Labs (SDLs) and Research Groups (POF4-511)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111
|c POF4-511
|f POF IV
|x 0
700 1 _ |a Adrian, Juliane
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)173971
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Boomers, Ann Katrin
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)178633
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Paetzke, Sarah
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)179043
|b 3
|u fzj
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/911322/files/20221013_fd_ContEq_TGF22.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:911322
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)132266
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)173971
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)178633
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)179043
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Engineering Digital Futures – Supercomputing, Data Management and Information Security for Knowledge and Action
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-510
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-511
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Enabling Computational- & Data-Intensive Science and Engineering
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5111
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2022
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-7-20180321
|k IAS-7
|l Zivile Sicherheitsforschung
|x 0
980 _ _ |a conf
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-7-20180321
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21