% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Pelusi:911404,
      author       = {Pelusi, Francesca and Sega, M. and Harting, J.},
      title        = {{L}iquid film rupture beyond the thin-film equation: {A}
                      multi-component lattice {B}oltzmann study},
      journal      = {Physics of fluids},
      volume       = {34},
      number       = {6},
      issn         = {1070-6631},
      address      = {[S.l.]},
      publisher    = {American Institute of Physics},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2022-04687},
      pages        = {062109 -},
      year         = {2022},
      abstract     = {Under the condition of partial surface wettability, thin
                      liquid films can be destabilized by small perturbations and
                      rupture into droplets. Assuccessfully predicted by the thin
                      film equation (TFE), the rupture dynamics are dictated by
                      the liquid–solid interaction. The theorydescribes the
                      latter using the disjoining pressure or, equivalently, the
                      contact angle. The introduction of a secondary fluid can
                      lead to a richerphenomenology, thanks to the presence of
                      different fluid/surface interaction energies but has so far
                      not been investigated. In this work, westudy the rupture of
                      liquid films with different heights immersed in a secondary
                      fluid using a multi-component lattice Boltzmann
                      (LB)approach. We investigate a wide range of surface
                      interaction energies, equilibrium contact angles, and film
                      thicknesses. We found that therupture time can differ by
                      about one order of magnitude for identical equilibrium
                      contact angles but different surface free
                      energies.Interestingly, the TFE describes the observed
                      breakup dynamics qualitatively well, up to equilibrium
                      contact angles as large as 130. A smallfilm thickness is a
                      much stricter requirement for the validity of the TFE, and
                      agreement with LB results is found only for ratios e ¼ h=L
                      ofthe film height h and lateral system size L, such as e
                      103.},
      cin          = {IEK-11},
      ddc          = {530},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-11-20140314},
      pnm          = {1215 - Simulations, Theory, Optics, and Analytics (STOA)
                      (POF4-121) / DFG project 431791331 - SFB 1452: Katalyse an
                      flüssigen Grenzflächen},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1215 / G:(GEPRIS)431791331},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000811423800006},
      doi          = {10.1063/5.0093043},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/911404},
}