% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Daniel:911503,
author = {Daniel, Davis Thomas and Eichel, Rüdiger-A. and Granwehr,
Josef},
title = {{L}aplace inverted pulsed {EPR} relaxation to study polymer
electrode/conductive carbon contact in lithium-ion battery},
school = {Utrecht University},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-04765},
year = {2022},
abstract = {The addition of conductive additives during electrode
fabrication is a standard practice tomitigate low intrinsic
conductivities of most cathode materials used in Li-ion
batteries. Toensure an optimal conduction pathway, these
conductive additives (carbon particles) need tobe in good
contact with the active material. This aspect is crucial for
Organic Polymer Radicalbatteries (ORB) where the insulating
polymer backbone could hinder the conductive contactbetween
redox-active groups and the carbon particles.Herein, we
demonstrate the combined use of Pulsed-EPR relaxometry and
Inverse LaplaceTransform (ILT) to study such electronic
contact. The investigated system comprises of
PTMAnitroxides, a commonly used redox unit in ORBs, and
SuperP carbon black as the conductiveadditive. Samples with
varying PTMA monomer to SuperP ratios (2:1 to 1:30) were
preparedby adding nitroxide solutions to SuperP, followed by
drying at 60°C. Pulsed-EPR basedInversion recovery
experiments (30K) were conducted to obtain T₁ relaxation
curves andILT[1] was used to obtain the corresponding
relaxation time distributions. For 1:2, therelaxation
distribution consists of three resolved relaxation
components corresponding todifferent grades of contact
between the carbon particles and the nitroxide radicals.
Uponincreasing the SuperP amount in the 1:20 sample, more
nitroxide radicals are brought intocontact with SuperP,
resulting in a decrease of the slower relaxing component and
an increaseof the faster relaxing components. Exchange
interactions between the spins lead tocoalescence of
spectral features making it difficult to separate these
components in the EPRspectrum itself.Our analysis suggests
that the composition of the electrode is a key factor in
determining thequality of active material/conductive carbon
contact and that pulsed EPR relaxometry incombination with
ILT may serve as a robust tool to study these
interactions.[1] J. Granwehr, P. J. Roberts, J. Chem. Theory
Comput. 2012, 8, 3473–3482.},
month = {Jul},
date = {2022-07-10},
organization = {European Magnetic Resonance Meeting
2022, Utrecht (Netherlands), 10 Jul
2022 - 14 Jul 2022},
subtyp = {After Call},
cin = {IEK-9},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-9-20110218},
pnm = {1223 - Batteries in Application (POF4-122) / Insight into
doping mechanisms of polymer electrolyte / redox-active
organic radical polymer lamellar composites (441255373) /
HITEC - Helmholtz Interdisciplinary Doctoral Training in
Energy and Climate Research (HITEC) (HITEC-20170406)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1223 / G:(GEPRIS)441255373 /
G:(DE-Juel1)HITEC-20170406},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)24},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/911503},
}