guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Comparison of battery electromotive-force measurement and modelling approaches > print |
| Home > Publications database > Comparison of battery electromotive-force measurement and modelling approaches > print |
| 001 | 911584 | ||
| 005 | 20240712112815.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1016/j.est.2022.105910 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2352-152X |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2352-1538 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2128/32695 |2 Handle |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000961005200008 |2 WOS |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2022-04843 |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 333.7 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Hoekstra, F. S. J. |0 0000-0002-1471-7489 |b 0 |e Corresponding author |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Comparison of battery electromotive-force measurement and modelling approaches |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Amsterdam [u.a.] |c 2022 |b Elsevier |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1669106244_13815 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a In this paper, different approaches for obtaining a battery Electromotive-Force (EMF) model, also referred to as Open-Circuit Voltage, are compared by experimentally measuring them and by subsequently applying different post-processing strategies, thus resulting in different EMF model realisations. The considered methods include GITT, interpolation of charge and discharge curves and extrapolation to zero current. The experiments are performed for two cells, namely a Lithium Nickel–Manganese–Cobalt (NMC) and a Lithium iron-Phosphate (LFP) cell. The accuracy of the EMF models is compared visually, as well as quantitatively in terms of voltage prediction accuracy using a linear parameter-varying overpotential model and SoC estimation accuracy using an extended Kalman filter. The results show that different methods excel at different performance indicators, for instance most accurate or least experiment time, but overall extrapolation to zero current has the best all-round performance. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 1223 - Batteries in Application (POF4-122) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1223 |c POF4-122 |f POF IV |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, Journals: juser.fz-juelich.de |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Raijmakers, L. H. J. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)176196 |b 1 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Donkers, M. C. F. |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Bergveld, H. J. |0 0000-0001-6498-3083 |b 3 |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1016/j.est.2022.105910 |g Vol. 56, p. 105910 - |0 PERI:(DE-600)2826805-2 |n Part B |p 105910 - |t Journal of energy storage |v 56 |y 2022 |x 2352-152X |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/911584/files/Hoekstra_2022_Comparison_of_Batt_EMF_Measurements_and_Modelling_Approaches.pdf |y OpenAccess |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:911584 |p openaire |p open_access |p VDB |p driver |p dnbdelivery |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 1 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)176196 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Forschungsbereich Energie |l Materialien und Technologien für die Energiewende (MTET) |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-120 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-122 |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |v Elektrochemische Energiespeicherung |9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1223 |x 0 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2022 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0 |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4 |2 HGFVOC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |d 2021-01-28 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160 |2 StatID |b Essential Science Indicators |d 2021-01-28 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b J ENERGY STORAGE : 2021 |d 2022-11-08 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |d 2022-11-08 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |d 2022-11-08 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |d 2022-11-08 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology |d 2022-11-08 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |d 2022-11-08 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a IF >= 5 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905 |2 StatID |b J ENERGY STORAGE : 2021 |d 2022-11-08 |
| 920 | _ | _ | |l yes |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-9-20110218 |k IEK-9 |l Grundlagen der Elektrochemie |x 0 |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-9-20110218 |
| 981 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IET-1-20110218 |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|