000911910 001__ 911910
000911910 005__ 20240712100835.0
000911910 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.5194/acp-22-15049-2022
000911910 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1680-7316
000911910 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1680-7324
000911910 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/32833
000911910 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000890899200001
000911910 037__ $$aFZJ-2022-05157
000911910 082__ $$a550
000911910 1001_ $$00000-0001-8966-9787$$aJesswein, Markus$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000911910 245__ $$aGlobal seasonal distribution of CH2Br2 and CHBr3 in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere
000911910 260__ $$aKatlenburg-Lindau$$bEGU$$c2022
000911910 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000911910 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000911910 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1669641239_8387
000911910 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000911910 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000911910 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000911910 520__ $$aBromine released from the decomposition of short-lived brominated source gases contributes as a sink of ozone in the lower stratosphere. The two major contributors are CH2Br2 and CHBr3. In this study, we investigate the global seasonal distribution of these two substances, based on four High Altitude and Long Range Research Aircraft (HALO) missions, the HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO) mission, and the Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) mission. Observations of CH2Br2 in the free and upper troposphere indicate a pronounced seasonality in both hemispheres, with slightly larger mixing ratios in the Northern Hemisphere (NH). Compared to CH2Br2, CHBr3 in these regions shows larger variability and less clear seasonality, presenting larger mixing ratios in winter and autumn in NH midlatitudes to high latitudes. The lowermost stratosphere of SH and NH shows a very similar distribution of CH2Br2 in hemispheric spring with differences well below 0.1 ppt, while the differences in hemispheric autumn are much larger with substantially smaller values in the SH than in the NH. This suggests that transport processes may be different in both hemispheric autumn seasons, which implies that the influx of tropospheric air (“flushing”) into the NH lowermost stratosphere is more efficient than in the SH. The observations of CHBr3 support the suggestion, with a steeper vertical gradient in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere in SH autumn than in NH autumn. However, the SH database is insufficient to quantify this difference. We further compare the observations to model estimates of TOMCAT (Toulouse Off-line Model of Chemistry And Transport) and CAM-Chem (Community Atmosphere Model with Chemistry, version 4), both using the same emission inventory of Ordóñez et al. (2012). The pronounced tropospheric seasonality of CH2Br2 in the SH is not reproduced by the models, presumably due to erroneous seasonal emissions or atmospheric photochemical decomposition efficiencies. In contrast, model simulations of CHBr3 show a pronounced seasonality in both hemispheres, which is not confirmed by observations. The distributions of both species in the lowermost stratosphere of the Northern and Southern hemispheres are overall well captured by the models with the exception of southern hemispheric autumn, where both models present a bias that maximizes in the lowest 40 K above the tropopause, with considerably lower mixing ratios in the observations. Thus, both models reproduce equivalent flushing in both hemispheres, which is not confirmed by the limited available observations. Our study emphasizes the need for more extensive observations in the SH to fully understand the impact of CH2Br2 and CHBr3 on lowermost-stratospheric ozone loss and to help constrain emissions.
000911910 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2112$$a2112 - Climate Feedbacks (POF4-211)$$cPOF4-211$$fPOF IV$$x0
000911910 588__ $$aDataset connected to DataCite
000911910 7001_ $$00000-0002-4114-5500$$aFernandez, Rafael P.$$b1
000911910 7001_ $$00000-0003-0407-6726$$aBerná, Lucas$$b2
000911910 7001_ $$00000-0002-0060-1581$$aSaiz-Lopez, Alfonso$$b3
000911910 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129122$$aGrooß, Jens-Uwe$$b4
000911910 7001_ $$00000-0003-2395-6657$$aHossaini, Ryan$$b5
000911910 7001_ $$aApel, Eric C.$$b6
000911910 7001_ $$00000-0002-6304-6554$$aHornbrook, Rebecca S.$$b7
000911910 7001_ $$00000-0003-3847-5346$$aAtlas, Elliot L.$$b8
000911910 7001_ $$aBlake, Donald R.$$b9
000911910 7001_ $$00000-0002-9396-0400$$aMontzka, Stephen$$b10
000911910 7001_ $$aKeber, Timo$$b11
000911910 7001_ $$00000-0002-1380-3684$$aSchuck, Tanja$$b12
000911910 7001_ $$00000-0002-4501-6108$$aWagenhäuser, Thomas$$b13
000911910 7001_ $$00000-0003-0557-3935$$aEngel, Andreas$$b14
000911910 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2069847-1$$a10.5194/acp-22-15049-2022$$gVol. 22, no. 22, p. 15049 - 15070$$n22$$p15049 - 15070$$tAtmospheric chemistry and physics$$v22$$x1680-7316$$y2022
000911910 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/911910/files/acp-22-15049-2022.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000911910 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:911910$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000911910 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129122$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b4$$kFZJ
000911910 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF4-211$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF4-210$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF4-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF4$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF4-2112$$aDE-HGF$$bForschungsbereich Erde und Umwelt$$lErde im Wandel – Unsere Zukunft nachhaltig gestalten$$vDie Atmosphäre im globalen Wandel$$x0
000911910 9141_ $$y2022
000911910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2021-02-02
000911910 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000911910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0113$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2021-02-02
000911910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2021-02-02
000911910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000911910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$d2021-02-02
000911910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2022-11-19
000911910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2022-11-19
000911910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2019-12-18T05:37:09Z
000911910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2019-12-18T05:37:09Z
000911910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Peer review$$d2019-12-18T05:37:09Z
000911910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2022-11-19
000911910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2022-11-19
000911910 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences$$d2022-11-19
000911910 920__ $$lyes
000911910 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013$$kIEK-7$$lStratosphäre$$x0
000911910 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000911910 980__ $$ajournal
000911910 980__ $$aVDB
000911910 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000911910 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
000911910 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-4-20101013