% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Daugherty:911989,
author = {Daugherty, Ana M. and Saifullah, Samaah and Augustinack,
Jean and Amunts, Katrin and Bakker, Arnold and Berron, David
and Brown, Thackery and Burggren, Alison and Chetelat, Gael
and Florès, Robin de and Ding, Song-Lin and Insausti,
Ricardo and Kedo, Olga and Joie, Renaud La and Malykhin,
Nikolai and Martinez, Anjelica and Mueller, Susanne and
Olsen, Rosanna and Palombo, Daniela and Raz, Naftali and
Stark, Craig and Wang, Lei and Wisse, Laura and Yushkevich,
Paul and Carr, Valerie},
title = {{H}ippocampal {S}ubfields {G}roup progress update:
{C}onsensus protocol to segment subfields within the
hippocampal body on high-resolution in vivo {MRI}},
reportid = {FZJ-2022-05219},
year = {2022},
abstract = {Hippocampal subfields are differentially sensitive in
development, aging, and neurodegenerative disease.
High-resolution imaging techniques have accelerated clinical
research of hippocampal subfields; however, substantial
differences in protocols impede comparisons in the
literature across laboratories. The Hippocampal Subfields
Group (HSG) is an international organization seeking to
address this issue by developing a histologically-valid,
reliable, and freely available segmentation protocol for
high-resolution T2-weighted 3T MRI
(http://www.hippocampalsubfields.com). This progress update
presents the consensus draft protocol for segmenting
subfields within the hippocampal body. The segmentation
protocol is based on a novel histological reference data set
labeled by multiple expert neuroanatomists. Two naïve
raters demonstrated feasibility on an MRI dataset including
brains from children and adults, and all subfield volume
measurements had good reliability. Twenty-six labs with
reported 4 years or more experience segmenting hippocampal
subfields in healthy lifespan and patient populations
participated in an online survey, which included detailed
protocol information, feasibility testing, demonstration
videos, example segmentations, and labeled histology. Due to
the complexity of the internal anatomy, two approaches for
segmenting the boundary between cornu ammonis (CA) 3 and
dentate gyrus subfields were presented, and the majority
approved a geometric heuristic-based protocol over one that
referenced the endfolial pathway anatomy: $58\%$ geometric,
$23\%$ endfolial, and with $19\%$ expressing no opinion.
Labs rated each internal boundary definition for clarity and
agreement with the protocol on a scale 1 (low) to 9 (high).
All definitions were rated with high clarity (M = 8.42 –
8.65) and reached consensus agreement (binomial ps < 0.01).
The geometric heuristic protocol includes labels for the
internal boundaries between subiculum, each CA field, and
dentate gyrus, which when combined with the external
boundaries that previously reached consensus, labels
subfield volumes throughout the hippocampal body. We are now
conducting a formal reliability test of the hippocampal body
protocol with a group of expert and novice raters who are
naïve to the protocol. With confirmation of reliability, we
will disseminate the validated harmonized segmentation
protocol and resources for automated segmentation. The
harmonized protocol will significantly facilitate
cross-study comparisons and provide increased insight into
the structure and function of hippocampal subfields across
the lifespan and in disease.},
month = {Nov},
date = {2022-11-12},
organization = {Society of Neuroscience (SfN), San
Diego (USA), 12 Nov 2022 - 16 Nov 2022},
subtyp = {Other},
cin = {INM-1},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-1-20090406},
pnm = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
(POF4-525)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)24},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/911989},
}