001     912487
005     20230301074015.0
024 7 _ |2 doi
|a 10.5445/IR/1000151373
024 7 _ |2 Handle
|a 2128/33220
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2022-05666
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 690
100 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)186000
|a Harzendorf, Freia
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a Domestic value added as an indicator for sustainability assessment: A case study on alternative drivetrains in the passenger car sector
260 _ _ |a Heidelberg
|b Springer
|c 2022
336 7 _ |2 DRIVER
|a article
336 7 _ |2 DataCite
|a Output Types/Journal article
336 7 _ |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|s 1671610339_28423
336 7 _ |2 BibTeX
|a ARTICLE
336 7 _ |2 ORCID
|a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
336 7 _ |0 0
|2 EndNote
|a Journal Article
520 _ _ |a To strengthen the economic pillar in sustainability assessment, the indicator ‘domestic value added’ is introduced. It aims at comparing established and less developed technologies regarding their prospective value added in a country. This is done by classifying a technology’s value added to the developed categories: domestic, potential domestic and non-domestic. Within this paper, two methods for assessing this indicator are introduced focussing on their applicability in a sustainability assessment context. Both methods are tested on a case study comparing two alternative drivetrain technologies for the passenger car sector (battery and fuel cell electric vehicle) to the conventionally used internal combustion engine. The first method is life cycle cost-based whereas the second is based on Input Output analysis. If a life cycle cost assessment is already available for the technology under assessment, the easier to implement life cycle cost-based approach is recommended, as the results are similar to the more complex Input Output-based approach. From the ‘domestic value added’ perspective, the battery electric vehicle is already more advantageous than the conventional internal combustion engine over the lifecycle. Fuel cell electric vehicles have the highest potential to increase their ‘domestic value added’ share in the future. This paper broadens the economic pillar in sustainability assessment by introducing a new indicator ‘domestic value added’ and giving practical information on how to prospectively assess it for existing and less developed technologies or innovations.
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112
|a 1112 - Societally Feasible Transformation Pathways (POF4-111)
|c POF4-111
|f POF IV
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to DataCite
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)168163
|a Wulf, Christina
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Haase, Martina
|b 2
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Baumann, Manuel
|b 3
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Ersoy, Hüseyin
|b 4
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)130493
|a Zapp, Petra
|b 5
|u fzj
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)2084025-1
|a 10.1007/s10098-022-02402-1
|p 3145–3169
|t Clean technologies and environmental policy
|v 24
|x 1435-2974
|y 2022
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/912487/files/Full_text.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:912487
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC_DEAL
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)186000
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 0
|k FZJ
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)168163
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 1
|k FZJ
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a KIT
|b 2
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a KIT
|b 3
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-HGF)0
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a KIT
|b 4
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)130493
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 5
|k FZJ
913 1 _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-111
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-110
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-100
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1112
|a DE-HGF
|b Forschungsbereich Energie
|l Energiesystemdesign (ESD)
|v Energiesystemtransformation
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2022
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0113
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a DEAL Springer
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3002
|2 StatID
|d 2021-01-27
|w ger
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2021-01-27
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-17
|w ger
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b CLEAN TECHNOL ENVIR : 2021
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
|d 2022-11-17
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|d 2022-11-17
915 p c |a APC keys set
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0000
915 p c |a Local Funding
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0001
915 p c |a DFG OA Publikationskosten
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0002
915 p c |a DEAL: Springer Nature 2020
|2 APC
|0 PC:(DE-HGF)0113
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
|k IEK-STE
|l Systemforschung und Technologische Entwicklung
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013
980 _ _ |a APC


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21