% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Kleineberg:912539,
      author       = {Kleineberg, Nina and Tscherpel, Caroline and Fink, Gereon
                      R. and Grefkes, Christian and Weiss, Peter H.},
      title        = {{D}ifferent facets of object-use pantomime: online {TMS}
                      evidence on the role of the supramarginal gyrus},
      journal      = {Cortex},
      volume       = {156},
      issn         = {0010-9452},
      address      = {New York, NY},
      publisher    = {Elsevier},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2022-05712},
      pages        = {13 - 25},
      year         = {2022},
      abstract     = {BackgroundA key question in apraxia research is which
                      specific cognitive processes in pantomiming the parietal
                      cortex supports. The manipulation-based hypothesis and the
                      technical-reasoning hypothesis ascribe different roles to
                      the inferior parietal lobule (IPL).ObjectiveWe elucidated
                      the role of the left supramarginal gyrus (SMG, i.e., part of
                      IPL) during the processing of different aspects of
                      object-use pantomime.MethodsThirty-one healthy participants
                      matched pantomimes with the corresponding object (PO) or the
                      corresponding situation (PS) during online transcranial
                      magnetic stimulation (TMS) interference applied to left SMG,
                      compared to a control stimulation (vertex). Notably, the
                      object corresponding to a given pantomime was explicitly not
                      shown in the PS task, excluding the possibility to analyse a
                      physical object. Matching an object to the corresponding
                      situation (OS) served as a control task.ResultsTMS
                      interference with left SMG significantly affected response
                      times for both investigated pantomime tasks (PO and PS); the
                      effect in the PO task significantly correlated with that in
                      the PS task. As expected, no TMS effect was observed in the
                      control task (OS).ConclusionLeft SMG does not only establish
                      a link between pantomime and a manipulable object but is
                      also involved in pantomime recognition and comprehension.
                      That TMS interfered with both pantomime tasks supports the
                      manipulation-based hypothesis, assuming that the IPL
                      recruits stored gesture engrams whenever pantomimes are
                      processed.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {5251 - Multilevel Brain Organization and Variability
                      (POF4-525) / 5252 - Brain Dysfunction and Plasticity
                      (POF4-525)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5251 / G:(DE-HGF)POF4-5252},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.cortex.2022.06.018},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/912539},
}